This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rich Internet Application article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
At this time ( May 2013) the JavaFX Scene Builder has reached beta 1.1
I would like to point out that the code for the Visual Layout Editor of the Curl (programming language) IDE has been available to developers for many years - prior to Curl moving to an eclipse plugin.
The Curl VLE is itself written in Curl, as is the Curl documentation viewer with its "live" code {example } macros.
G. Robert Shiplett 19:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
So, I notice that Ember just got added to this article, and I'm guessing if that can be justified then Angular and other MVC frameworks can't be far behind, which raises the question: what is the point of this article? In this context RIA seems like it's just an antiquated term for single-page application, and the article fails to differentiate itself except with a bolted on history of browser plugins. Should we pick some kind if cut-off point and have veering thing after that discussed as SPAs? Or merge to that article, which probably means deleting most of this article? Or just cut our losses and make this page a redirect? Artw ( talk) 13:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Rich Internet application. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:38, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Regarding:
Shouldn't it be "rich Internet application" (lowercase, except for the proper noun)? -- Mortense ( talk) 14:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite ( talk • contribs) 15:09, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Rich web application → Rich Internet Application – See WP:COMMONNAME and the comments in the section above: Talk:Rich web application#"Rich Internet Application". -- C. A. Russell ( talk) 14:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
The thing to be aware of (re User:SilverLocust's ngrams methodology) is that (a) ngrams are going to be necessarily constrained to 2002 or later, but (b) following Wikipedia's own move, lots of other places will have picked up and followed suit since for better or worse they assume that the decisions behind Wikipedia's "position" are well reasoned—and so they end up *generating* occurrences of the phrase. I don't think it's a major issue in this case. I mean, it did happen—other sources with a copycat attitude *did* pop up using the same terminology; it's just that this isn't a huge contentious topic (yet?). -- C. A. Russell ( talk) 22:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Rich Internet Application article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
At this time ( May 2013) the JavaFX Scene Builder has reached beta 1.1
I would like to point out that the code for the Visual Layout Editor of the Curl (programming language) IDE has been available to developers for many years - prior to Curl moving to an eclipse plugin.
The Curl VLE is itself written in Curl, as is the Curl documentation viewer with its "live" code {example } macros.
G. Robert Shiplett 19:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
So, I notice that Ember just got added to this article, and I'm guessing if that can be justified then Angular and other MVC frameworks can't be far behind, which raises the question: what is the point of this article? In this context RIA seems like it's just an antiquated term for single-page application, and the article fails to differentiate itself except with a bolted on history of browser plugins. Should we pick some kind if cut-off point and have veering thing after that discussed as SPAs? Or merge to that article, which probably means deleting most of this article? Or just cut our losses and make this page a redirect? Artw ( talk) 13:52, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Rich Internet application. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:38, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Regarding:
Shouldn't it be "rich Internet application" (lowercase, except for the proper noun)? -- Mortense ( talk) 14:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite ( talk • contribs) 15:09, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Rich web application → Rich Internet Application – See WP:COMMONNAME and the comments in the section above: Talk:Rich web application#"Rich Internet Application". -- C. A. Russell ( talk) 14:59, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
The thing to be aware of (re User:SilverLocust's ngrams methodology) is that (a) ngrams are going to be necessarily constrained to 2002 or later, but (b) following Wikipedia's own move, lots of other places will have picked up and followed suit since for better or worse they assume that the decisions behind Wikipedia's "position" are well reasoned—and so they end up *generating* occurrences of the phrase. I don't think it's a major issue in this case. I mean, it did happen—other sources with a copycat attitude *did* pop up using the same terminology; it's just that this isn't a huge contentious topic (yet?). -- C. A. Russell ( talk) 22:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)