This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-04-13. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The reference that the fark cliche is Ric Romero reporting things that are NOT newsworthy is inaccurate. The cliche is that he reports things that are already painfully obvious. This needs to be fixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.72.100.2 ( talk) 22:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
I suggest a lock, Farkers are vandalising
I know there are what I can only refer to as "anti-Fark" editors who have cut out the "Fark related" portions of this article. This is foolish, as, like it or not, Fark is relevant, and this is now a permanent part of his notoriety. Editing it down a bit certainly would be a better choice, not a complete denuding of the section as was done recently. If five thousand albums is enough for a garage band to make relevance here, 100,000 or so Farkers is certainly more than enough for a mere section of an article of an already well known news reporter. Un focused 02:36, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I am proposing that the disambiguation page be deleted and this page go back to being for Ric Romero only. Calwatch 00:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Ric Romero is on Myspace! http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=70486333 -- God Ω War 03:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
I would like to add that all the articles that Ric Romero has his name attached to on the website for his station, are duplicated across ALL ABC TV station websites, with different bylines on them
I hitherto and forthwith state my disagreement with the proposal to merge this article with Fark.com. As has been mentioned numerous times previously, Ric Romero is notable outside of his fame from the "Fark connection." Merging would remove significant content, and detract from the informativeness (is that even a word?) of Wikipedia on the subject. -- Y|yukichigai 21:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Although Ric Romero has gained most of his nationwide notability through Fark.com, he is known first and foremost as a local correspondent for ABC. This article should not be into the Fark.com article. Sharkface217 02:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
My gawd!!!!!!!!!! Think of the children!!!!!! Everything simply MUST revolve around the vile spawn so do only that which benefits the CHILDREN!!!!!!!!!! Obbop, childless by informed choice, told yah' this. 68.13.191.153 22:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm a little confused as to what the argument is, based on WP:BLP, for removing the "Internet fame" section. The content is not libelous, scandalous, and is properly sourced. It in no way compromises the privacy of Mr. Romero. It merely describes a relevant aspect of his notability, specifically his notability on the internet and FARK in particular, and is properly sourced. There are no other provisions of BLP to address; the section passes all of them just fine. -- Y| yukichigai ( ramble argue check) 21:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Quoting someone I trust: "An obscure website likes to make fun of him? And this is important HOW?" We do not exist to give Fark notability. This information is irrelevant and should stay off the article. ++ Lar: t/ c 13:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
The URL in reference number 3 ( http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=consumer&id=3549166) is no longer valid. The link could be changed to:
http://web.archive.org/web/20070217134725/http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=consumer&id=3549166 -- Speakermeonce ( talk) 01:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-04-13. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The reference that the fark cliche is Ric Romero reporting things that are NOT newsworthy is inaccurate. The cliche is that he reports things that are already painfully obvious. This needs to be fixed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.72.100.2 ( talk) 22:58, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
I suggest a lock, Farkers are vandalising
I know there are what I can only refer to as "anti-Fark" editors who have cut out the "Fark related" portions of this article. This is foolish, as, like it or not, Fark is relevant, and this is now a permanent part of his notoriety. Editing it down a bit certainly would be a better choice, not a complete denuding of the section as was done recently. If five thousand albums is enough for a garage band to make relevance here, 100,000 or so Farkers is certainly more than enough for a mere section of an article of an already well known news reporter. Un focused 02:36, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
I am proposing that the disambiguation page be deleted and this page go back to being for Ric Romero only. Calwatch 00:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Ric Romero is on Myspace! http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=70486333 -- God Ω War 03:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
I would like to add that all the articles that Ric Romero has his name attached to on the website for his station, are duplicated across ALL ABC TV station websites, with different bylines on them
I hitherto and forthwith state my disagreement with the proposal to merge this article with Fark.com. As has been mentioned numerous times previously, Ric Romero is notable outside of his fame from the "Fark connection." Merging would remove significant content, and detract from the informativeness (is that even a word?) of Wikipedia on the subject. -- Y|yukichigai 21:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Although Ric Romero has gained most of his nationwide notability through Fark.com, he is known first and foremost as a local correspondent for ABC. This article should not be into the Fark.com article. Sharkface217 02:25, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
My gawd!!!!!!!!!! Think of the children!!!!!! Everything simply MUST revolve around the vile spawn so do only that which benefits the CHILDREN!!!!!!!!!! Obbop, childless by informed choice, told yah' this. 68.13.191.153 22:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm a little confused as to what the argument is, based on WP:BLP, for removing the "Internet fame" section. The content is not libelous, scandalous, and is properly sourced. It in no way compromises the privacy of Mr. Romero. It merely describes a relevant aspect of his notability, specifically his notability on the internet and FARK in particular, and is properly sourced. There are no other provisions of BLP to address; the section passes all of them just fine. -- Y| yukichigai ( ramble argue check) 21:40, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Quoting someone I trust: "An obscure website likes to make fun of him? And this is important HOW?" We do not exist to give Fark notability. This information is irrelevant and should stay off the article. ++ Lar: t/ c 13:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
The URL in reference number 3 ( http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=consumer&id=3549166) is no longer valid. The link could be changed to:
http://web.archive.org/web/20070217134725/http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=consumer&id=3549166 -- Speakermeonce ( talk) 01:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)