This article was nominated for deletion on 29 January 2008. The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
How come this page wasn't deleted per discussion? -- 88.148.220.242 ( talk) 14:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello 10mmsocket, I have seen that you have reverted my edit. [1] I would like to improve the article's quality and make it a decent Wikipedia article with proper references to good reliable secondary sources. The article has, in its current state, only 9 references to sources, of which I deem most not acceptable, which is also reflected by the warning in the lead section.
I think it's without a doubt that this needs fixing. I have cited substantially more sources, and I have put emphasis on sources that are not closely associated with Red Dot. Please note that my version has such a huge increase in byte size because about 14,000 bytes of my addition are just references, i.e. the text addition is significantly less "radical" than what it might seem.
I believe that the current version is not ideal because it completely omits the history, and because it barely describes the Red Dot award in its current state. It also contains factual inaccuracies. When writing the new version of the article, I tried sticking to Wikipedia's good article criteria as good as possible. Could you do me a favour and have another look at my version to check whether certain parts still need amending? I would really appreciate it. Best, -- Felix Guattari ( talk) 10:15, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 29 January 2008. The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
How come this page wasn't deleted per discussion? -- 88.148.220.242 ( talk) 14:07, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello 10mmsocket, I have seen that you have reverted my edit. [1] I would like to improve the article's quality and make it a decent Wikipedia article with proper references to good reliable secondary sources. The article has, in its current state, only 9 references to sources, of which I deem most not acceptable, which is also reflected by the warning in the lead section.
I think it's without a doubt that this needs fixing. I have cited substantially more sources, and I have put emphasis on sources that are not closely associated with Red Dot. Please note that my version has such a huge increase in byte size because about 14,000 bytes of my addition are just references, i.e. the text addition is significantly less "radical" than what it might seem.
I believe that the current version is not ideal because it completely omits the history, and because it barely describes the Red Dot award in its current state. It also contains factual inaccuracies. When writing the new version of the article, I tried sticking to Wikipedia's good article criteria as good as possible. Could you do me a favour and have another look at my version to check whether certain parts still need amending? I would really appreciate it. Best, -- Felix Guattari ( talk) 10:15, 31 May 2023 (UTC)