This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
I added the section about the data tampering allegations Randox is currently being investigated for as I thought it was relevant but missing. However, the entire tone of the article is promotional and reads like a corporate website. A look at the history makes me suspect someone with a vested interest in the company wrote the article as lots of tokens like "the world's only" etc. have been chipped away over time. A total revamp wouldn't be a bad thing.
EditingWikiAccount (
talk) 23:07, 27 January 2018 (UTC)reply
→In fact, a closer look at the history shows that most of the article was written by a user called "RandoxLabs".
EditingWikiAccount (
talk) 23:10, 27 January 2018 (UTC)reply
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
I added the section about the data tampering allegations Randox is currently being investigated for as I thought it was relevant but missing. However, the entire tone of the article is promotional and reads like a corporate website. A look at the history makes me suspect someone with a vested interest in the company wrote the article as lots of tokens like "the world's only" etc. have been chipped away over time. A total revamp wouldn't be a bad thing.
EditingWikiAccount (
talk) 23:07, 27 January 2018 (UTC)reply
→In fact, a closer look at the history shows that most of the article was written by a user called "RandoxLabs".
EditingWikiAccount (
talk) 23:10, 27 January 2018 (UTC)reply