This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
This article is gibberish. Nobody reading it would have any clue as to how a quick return mechanism was constructed after reading it. If it wasn't written as a hoax (which would seem the most likely explanation), it was written by someone with no background in either basic engineering or highschool-level physics, attempting to describe something using words and concepts they clearly don't understand. If Wikipedia needs an article on 'quick return mechanisms' (of which there are a large number, of widely differing form, used in widely differing contexts), it needs writing again from scratch. Euan Houzami ( talk) 14:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
I chanced upon this one in the shaper article, which isn't that good. We need a better, and we need one in the Whitworth version as well. Mangoe ( talk) 19:41, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
This article is gibberish. Nobody reading it would have any clue as to how a quick return mechanism was constructed after reading it. If it wasn't written as a hoax (which would seem the most likely explanation), it was written by someone with no background in either basic engineering or highschool-level physics, attempting to describe something using words and concepts they clearly don't understand. If Wikipedia needs an article on 'quick return mechanisms' (of which there are a large number, of widely differing form, used in widely differing contexts), it needs writing again from scratch. Euan Houzami ( talk) 14:34, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
I chanced upon this one in the shaper article, which isn't that good. We need a better, and we need one in the Whitworth version as well. Mangoe ( talk) 19:41, 24 July 2018 (UTC)