This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Pushyabhuti dynasty article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to South Asian social groups, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I propose to merge Empire of Harsha into this page since it's about the empire of one of the kings of this dynasty. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo ( talk · contribs · count) 22:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Though I propose to merge 'Empire of Harsha' page with 'Harsha' page because both page talks about same person. 202.41.10.3 ( talk) 14:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Ratan Singh
@ Highpeaks35: Anjana Motihar Chandra is not a historian - she is a freelance writer. The book is not WP:HISTRS-compliant at all. Hans Bakker (cited in the article) prefers the term Pushyabhuti (Puṣyabhūti) to describe the family, as do several other reputed historians. utcursch | talk 14:46, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The information given in the article that Pushyabhuti Dynasty was a Jatt Dynasty is factually wrong.As per the interpretation of the ancient text either this dynasty was Bais Rajput or from Vaishya caste but certainly not from Jatt caste.
Please change the article otherwise it's misrepresentation of history. Abhimanyu200 ( talk) 17:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Pushabhuti were not jat. Correct it. Jatt were not even present in northern India at 7th century. Ndnsnd ( talk) 12:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This is with respect to the Origin of Pushyabhuti.
In Arya-Manjushri it is written that Harshavardhan was a Bais. Now, Bais is also a clan of Kshatriya Rajput.
So, it cannot be said conclusively that Harshvardhan was a Viashya caste.
Please remove the mention of Vaishya caste in the origin section.You can mention that he was a "Bais" as mentioned in Arya-Manjushri, the primery source. Abhimanyu200 ( talk) 18:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Pushyabhuti dynasty article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to South Asian social groups, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I propose to merge Empire of Harsha into this page since it's about the empire of one of the kings of this dynasty. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo ( talk · contribs · count) 22:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
Though I propose to merge 'Empire of Harsha' page with 'Harsha' page because both page talks about same person. 202.41.10.3 ( talk) 14:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Ratan Singh
@ Highpeaks35: Anjana Motihar Chandra is not a historian - she is a freelance writer. The book is not WP:HISTRS-compliant at all. Hans Bakker (cited in the article) prefers the term Pushyabhuti (Puṣyabhūti) to describe the family, as do several other reputed historians. utcursch | talk 14:46, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The information given in the article that Pushyabhuti Dynasty was a Jatt Dynasty is factually wrong.As per the interpretation of the ancient text either this dynasty was Bais Rajput or from Vaishya caste but certainly not from Jatt caste.
Please change the article otherwise it's misrepresentation of history. Abhimanyu200 ( talk) 17:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Pushabhuti were not jat. Correct it. Jatt were not even present in northern India at 7th century. Ndnsnd ( talk) 12:13, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This is with respect to the Origin of Pushyabhuti.
In Arya-Manjushri it is written that Harshavardhan was a Bais. Now, Bais is also a clan of Kshatriya Rajput.
So, it cannot be said conclusively that Harshvardhan was a Viashya caste.
Please remove the mention of Vaishya caste in the origin section.You can mention that he was a "Bais" as mentioned in Arya-Manjushri, the primery source. Abhimanyu200 ( talk) 18:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)