GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewers: RCSprinter123 ( talk) 16:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC) and Swarm X 02:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
1.Well written:
2. Factually accuarate and verifiable:
3. Broad in its coverage
4. Neutral:
5. Stable
6. Illustrated by images - only 7 images on whole page including a map, field, buildings and a blue plaque; but they are relevant to the topic and have suitable captions; all copyright and everything.
Now, there are nine s, and three s, so the majority speaks for itself! This has a good chance of getting to Good Article status!
A few things here and there but all in all...
Please reply to the discussion below. Rcsprinter ( talk) - (Reviewer) 17:26 2 February 2011
Alright, I've reviewed the article. I won't make another checklist; I'll just share my thoughts. It looks like five of the listed books in the references section don't have ISBN numbers. Would it be possible to track those down? It would also be good if you could put together a 'See also' section. If you feel that would be futile or too difficult for some reason, I'll take your word for it, but if you can it would be best. Also, what do you think about changing the "Geography" section to "Route" or "Location" or something like that? I'll leave this up to you, it's merely a minor suggestion. Swarm X 02:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Done Swarm X 20:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewers: RCSprinter123 ( talk) 16:50, 2 February 2011 (UTC) and Swarm X 02:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
1.Well written:
2. Factually accuarate and verifiable:
3. Broad in its coverage
4. Neutral:
5. Stable
6. Illustrated by images - only 7 images on whole page including a map, field, buildings and a blue plaque; but they are relevant to the topic and have suitable captions; all copyright and everything.
Now, there are nine s, and three s, so the majority speaks for itself! This has a good chance of getting to Good Article status!
A few things here and there but all in all...
Please reply to the discussion below. Rcsprinter ( talk) - (Reviewer) 17:26 2 February 2011
Alright, I've reviewed the article. I won't make another checklist; I'll just share my thoughts. It looks like five of the listed books in the references section don't have ISBN numbers. Would it be possible to track those down? It would also be good if you could put together a 'See also' section. If you feel that would be futile or too difficult for some reason, I'll take your word for it, but if you can it would be best. Also, what do you think about changing the "Geography" section to "Route" or "Location" or something like that? I'll leave this up to you, it's merely a minor suggestion. Swarm X 02:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Done Swarm X 20:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC)