This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Pope John Paul I conspiracy theories article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article was nominated for deletion on 28 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Before we consider "conspiracy theories" - which is already POV - shouldn't there be an issue of "un/natural death"? Could he not have been murdered by one person acting alone? -- Hugh7 ( talk) 04:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
I've moved the Neutrality tag from Pope John Paul I to here after discussion on the that talk page. The POV tag here seems closely linked with the {{cleanup}} and {{unreferenced}} tags on this article. Please see the information on Talk:Pope John Paul I for more information and previous discussions about the neutrality (or lack there of) of this section. — mako ( talk• contribs) 14:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Didn't the film Godfather III suggest that the death of this Pope was a conspiracy that involved Michael Corleone? I'd think it would be included in the Popular Culture section. 204.115.253.51 18:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
This article is not a biography and is not within the scope of the WikiProject Biography. Removed WikiBio tag. C. Williams ( talk) 06:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
There are also conspiracy theories out there that claim that Pope John Paul I was ready to tolerate homosexuality and abortion, and that this was one for the reasons for his alleged poisoning. I find this to be quite far-fetched, but if anyone else can find evidence that Archbishop Luciani tolerated those things, it would not be a bad thing to write them down. [1] ADM ( talk) 04:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
I’ve moved the bit about Godfather III to the Popular Culture section; it doesn’t really fit in the Rationale section, does it? Moonraker12 ( talk) 16:26, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm removing the tags which said there weren't enough references and so forth, since there are plenty of references now.
This article was
considered for deletion, and requires
cleanup according to
the discussion. (October 2008) |
This article includes a
list of references,
related reading, or
external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks
inline citations. (January 2008) |
Gone. -- Bluejay Young ( talk) 05:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Say, killing people. Therefore, I ammended the sentence that previously said it's "impossible" to be a Roman Catholic and a Freemason (hell, I know two Freemasons that were baptised and nobody bothered to excommunicate so far, thus being Roman Catholics). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.7.130.139 ( talk) 20:14, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
the author doesn't have a wiki page and the recipient of the VC linked to as the author died over 100 years before the event of pope john paul I's death. can someone clean that up? 188.220.151.59 ( talk) 16:47, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Many of these [conspiracy theories] concern the serious corruption in the Vatican Bank (Istituto per le Opere Religiose), possibly linked to Freemasonry, which is forbidden by church law. None of the claims have been substantiated.
I saw that after John Paul I's beatification, which happened last month, a user changed without consensus the original grave's image with one which depicts the current grave which presents the Blessed status of JPI. However, since this article talks about the conspiracy theories around his death and doesn't cite in any moment the beatification, I consider that it would be more relevant for the article the original grave's image.
I added that photograph to the article but, since I saw that I'm reverted for doesn't getting consensus about that, I thought it would be more appropiate explaining that here also. Best regards and thanks. 83.61.243.178 ( talk) 10:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
I also saw at the end of the article this notice in red: "Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha>
tags or {{efn}}
templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the
help page)." Can anyone be able to fix this error? Thanks again.
83.61.243.178 (
talk) 10:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Pope John Paul I conspiracy theories article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article was nominated for deletion on 28 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Before we consider "conspiracy theories" - which is already POV - shouldn't there be an issue of "un/natural death"? Could he not have been murdered by one person acting alone? -- Hugh7 ( talk) 04:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
I've moved the Neutrality tag from Pope John Paul I to here after discussion on the that talk page. The POV tag here seems closely linked with the {{cleanup}} and {{unreferenced}} tags on this article. Please see the information on Talk:Pope John Paul I for more information and previous discussions about the neutrality (or lack there of) of this section. — mako ( talk• contribs) 14:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Didn't the film Godfather III suggest that the death of this Pope was a conspiracy that involved Michael Corleone? I'd think it would be included in the Popular Culture section. 204.115.253.51 18:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
This article is not a biography and is not within the scope of the WikiProject Biography. Removed WikiBio tag. C. Williams ( talk) 06:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
There are also conspiracy theories out there that claim that Pope John Paul I was ready to tolerate homosexuality and abortion, and that this was one for the reasons for his alleged poisoning. I find this to be quite far-fetched, but if anyone else can find evidence that Archbishop Luciani tolerated those things, it would not be a bad thing to write them down. [1] ADM ( talk) 04:07, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
I’ve moved the bit about Godfather III to the Popular Culture section; it doesn’t really fit in the Rationale section, does it? Moonraker12 ( talk) 16:26, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm removing the tags which said there weren't enough references and so forth, since there are plenty of references now.
This article was
considered for deletion, and requires
cleanup according to
the discussion. (October 2008) |
This article includes a
list of references,
related reading, or
external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks
inline citations. (January 2008) |
Gone. -- Bluejay Young ( talk) 05:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Say, killing people. Therefore, I ammended the sentence that previously said it's "impossible" to be a Roman Catholic and a Freemason (hell, I know two Freemasons that were baptised and nobody bothered to excommunicate so far, thus being Roman Catholics). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.7.130.139 ( talk) 20:14, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
the author doesn't have a wiki page and the recipient of the VC linked to as the author died over 100 years before the event of pope john paul I's death. can someone clean that up? 188.220.151.59 ( talk) 16:47, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Many of these [conspiracy theories] concern the serious corruption in the Vatican Bank (Istituto per le Opere Religiose), possibly linked to Freemasonry, which is forbidden by church law. None of the claims have been substantiated.
I saw that after John Paul I's beatification, which happened last month, a user changed without consensus the original grave's image with one which depicts the current grave which presents the Blessed status of JPI. However, since this article talks about the conspiracy theories around his death and doesn't cite in any moment the beatification, I consider that it would be more relevant for the article the original grave's image.
I added that photograph to the article but, since I saw that I'm reverted for doesn't getting consensus about that, I thought it would be more appropiate explaining that here also. Best regards and thanks. 83.61.243.178 ( talk) 10:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
I also saw at the end of the article this notice in red: "Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha>
tags or {{efn}}
templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the
help page)." Can anyone be able to fix this error? Thanks again.
83.61.243.178 (
talk) 10:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)