From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia policy is no propaganda

Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. An article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to describe the topic from a neutral point of view. You might wish to start a blog or visit a forum if you want to convince people of the merits of your opinions.

This articles serves as a showcase of propaganda. No attempt has been made to report objectively. That is why there is no summary in the lead. This isn't an article. Look closely. Most sections consist of a bundle of statements. As a whole the article is mostly a list of quotations consisting solely of propaganda. This is contrary to our policy of no propaganda in any form. This "article" barely attempts to describe anything, let alone report objectively. We need to talk about in first person Wikipedia voice, not be parrots. Its purely copied and pasted factoid assertions. This kind of page destroys our reputation. There are countless other articles full to the brim with quoted propaganda. Very bad. - Shiftchange ( talk) 23:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC) reply

There are nearly 200 citations, and they check out. Can you provide as many verified counter-samples? Thought not. 2A00:23C8:8F9F:4801:2C4E:A7C6:B2C7:9B26 ( talk) 18:04, 15 November 2022 (UTC) reply
Just trying to include Trump's statement that he would "only be a dictator on day one," to attempt an addendum or attachment to the information provided :Reference: https://apnews.com/article/trump-hannity-dictator-authoritarian-presidential-election-f27e7e9d7c13fabbe3ae7dd7f1235c72
And further, to equate his actions, and/or promises, with such. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ivanka-trump-donald-trump-latest-g20-meeting-outrage-hamburg-germany-anne-applebaum-nicholas-kristoff-charles-blow-a7830816.html
Not forgetting his current promotions: /info/en/?search=Project_2025
And the Wikipedia article: /info/en/?search=Social_policy_of_Donald_Trump
Thousands of support articles are available on request. 2603:8081:7404:6C00:A410:3930:9311:D66 ( talk) 03:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Add neo-Nazi

Trump is neo nazi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.198.38.93 ( talk) 02:17, 8 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected edit request on 30 January 2024

Change "bill that would designate that would mandate the" to "bill that would designate the" or "bill that would mandate the" Joeybe0410 ( talk) 03:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC) reply

 Done here. Thanks for flagging! Philipnelson99 ( talk) 03:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia policy is no propaganda

Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. An article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to describe the topic from a neutral point of view. You might wish to start a blog or visit a forum if you want to convince people of the merits of your opinions.

This articles serves as a showcase of propaganda. No attempt has been made to report objectively. That is why there is no summary in the lead. This isn't an article. Look closely. Most sections consist of a bundle of statements. As a whole the article is mostly a list of quotations consisting solely of propaganda. This is contrary to our policy of no propaganda in any form. This "article" barely attempts to describe anything, let alone report objectively. We need to talk about in first person Wikipedia voice, not be parrots. Its purely copied and pasted factoid assertions. This kind of page destroys our reputation. There are countless other articles full to the brim with quoted propaganda. Very bad. - Shiftchange ( talk) 23:54, 11 January 2021 (UTC) reply

There are nearly 200 citations, and they check out. Can you provide as many verified counter-samples? Thought not. 2A00:23C8:8F9F:4801:2C4E:A7C6:B2C7:9B26 ( talk) 18:04, 15 November 2022 (UTC) reply
Just trying to include Trump's statement that he would "only be a dictator on day one," to attempt an addendum or attachment to the information provided :Reference: https://apnews.com/article/trump-hannity-dictator-authoritarian-presidential-election-f27e7e9d7c13fabbe3ae7dd7f1235c72
And further, to equate his actions, and/or promises, with such. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/ivanka-trump-donald-trump-latest-g20-meeting-outrage-hamburg-germany-anne-applebaum-nicholas-kristoff-charles-blow-a7830816.html
Not forgetting his current promotions: /info/en/?search=Project_2025
And the Wikipedia article: /info/en/?search=Social_policy_of_Donald_Trump
Thousands of support articles are available on request. 2603:8081:7404:6C00:A410:3930:9311:D66 ( talk) 03:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Add neo-Nazi

Trump is neo nazi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.198.38.93 ( talk) 02:17, 8 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Semi-protected edit request on 30 January 2024

Change "bill that would designate that would mandate the" to "bill that would designate the" or "bill that would mandate the" Joeybe0410 ( talk) 03:38, 30 January 2024 (UTC) reply

 Done here. Thanks for flagging! Philipnelson99 ( talk) 03:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook