GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Rcsprinter123 ( talk · contribs) 22:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article. My strategy is to give overall comments about the article, then go through it section by section, check all the references, and finally to check it against the Good Article criteria. I'll let the nominator know when I'm ready for their response. Rcsprinter123 (articulate) @ 22:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
This looks like quite a strong article. It only receives around 13 views per day but is perfectly notable. The nominator has performed many significant expansions and the edit history reveals not one revertion, so it's very stable. There are many references and quite a lot of detail, illustrated with images.
No other issues
What is with the listing of references down at the bottom and then named above, rather than having the references inline and simply having {{ reflist}} at the bottom? This can be left but I was wondering why the unusual way of doing it, and also that they would be better in two columns, because the list is quite long.
Just need to fix my above suggestions then the article can be promoted. Rcsprinter123 (cackle) @ 22:28, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Rcsprinter123 ( talk · contribs) 22:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article. My strategy is to give overall comments about the article, then go through it section by section, check all the references, and finally to check it against the Good Article criteria. I'll let the nominator know when I'm ready for their response. Rcsprinter123 (articulate) @ 22:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
This looks like quite a strong article. It only receives around 13 views per day but is perfectly notable. The nominator has performed many significant expansions and the edit history reveals not one revertion, so it's very stable. There are many references and quite a lot of detail, illustrated with images.
No other issues
What is with the listing of references down at the bottom and then named above, rather than having the references inline and simply having {{ reflist}} at the bottom? This can be left but I was wondering why the unusual way of doing it, and also that they would be better in two columns, because the list is quite long.
Just need to fix my above suggestions then the article can be promoted. Rcsprinter123 (cackle) @ 22:28, 21 February 2014 (UTC)