This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is a local free sheet. Does it actually deserve a page? raining girl ( talk) 17:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Further, I notice I'm not the first person to mention this, and that the last commment (calling it rather less politely 'a leftist fish wrapper') was deleted. raining girl ( talk) 17:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Is it really appropriate to quote the newspaper's self-description from their website in a neutral encyclopedia article? This seems more like self-promotion. XINOPH | TALK 23:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Phoenix New Times front page.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 21 November 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 21:36, 21 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Phoenix New Times. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://abcas3.accessabc.com/ecirc/magform.asp{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=18959063&BRD=1395&PAG=461&dept_id=216613&rfi=6When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The whole section on arrest controversy seems to be outdated, Azcentral reported on a more recent lawsuit which is worth mention on this article. Either that or a link to this section of backpage. Any thoughts? CR055H41RZ ( talk) 01:46, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is a local free sheet. Does it actually deserve a page? raining girl ( talk) 17:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Further, I notice I'm not the first person to mention this, and that the last commment (calling it rather less politely 'a leftist fish wrapper') was deleted. raining girl ( talk) 17:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Is it really appropriate to quote the newspaper's self-description from their website in a neutral encyclopedia article? This seems more like self-promotion. XINOPH | TALK 23:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Phoenix New Times front page.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 21 November 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 21:36, 21 November 2011 (UTC) |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Phoenix New Times. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://abcas3.accessabc.com/ecirc/magform.asp{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=18959063&BRD=1395&PAG=461&dept_id=216613&rfi=6When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
The whole section on arrest controversy seems to be outdated, Azcentral reported on a more recent lawsuit which is worth mention on this article. Either that or a link to this section of backpage. Any thoughts? CR055H41RZ ( talk) 01:46, 30 August 2017 (UTC)