This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Philippine eagle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Can somebody improve the "Relationship With Humans" section? I am not sure what the author meant. Is it about the way captive Philippine Eagles imprint their caretakers as surrogate mates? That would be an interesting section. The current one talks only about presidential proclamations, certainly not about relationship with humans.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by TheOneWithTheDeerOnIt ( talk • contribs) 16:05, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
This bird is not Critically endangered. They have improved since last time which only had about less then 100 but now it's like alot now. Also, about changing the name, it should be Philippine Eagle since it can only be found in the Philippines! If it's some where in another countries I will accept in changing it but since you can only find it in parts of Philippines then I believe people can and should call it Philippine Eagle!
Also about that carabao you are talking about. Obviously we can't call Water buffalo our own name for it because you can find water buffalos in other parts of asia. We can't call it ours not like the Philippine Eagle which is only found in the Philippines. Same goes for SAMPAGUITA. You can find that flower in other countries so we can't own it by naming it the official name as SAMPAGUITA for everyone!
If you are complaining that we shouldn't name it as an english word then I believe you should call it Haring Ibon or Haribon instead if you don't like it being called by an english name like Philippine Eagle.
210.185.184.98 12:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Well, i may be not the best person to tell about the Haribon. But I beg to disagree with calling it the Philippine Eagle. There is no English common name for this bird. The term Philippine Eagle is nothing but an invention. I believe that as the English speaknig world accepted to use the word 'CONDOR' (from Quechua) rather than 'HAWK', they begin to accept the natinve name we gave to our national bird.
After all, unlike the 'CARABAO', there is no other country in the world that claims the 'HARIBON' to be a symbol of their national pride. If someone argues that the 'HARIBON' has an existing English name, I suggest that we change the name of 'SAMPAGUITA' into 'ARABIC JASMINE'. Well, that is just a reaction. Thank you. NASUGBU BATANGAS 210.185.184.98 12:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
I've always known and heard it as "Philippine Eagle". And I think it is the widely known name for it. So I vote we keep it that way
192.146.101.24 07:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
What is meant by "this country" at the end of Unique Evolutionary History? I presume it means the Philippenes but it is not clear at first glance. It could potentially be interpreted as the country in which the writer is situated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoyo1505 ( talk • contribs) 10:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I think it's clearly talking about the Country - Philippines, for it's obvious, the eagle specie aa named "Philippine eagle." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.69.49.198 ( talk) 10:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
The 'unique evoltutionary history' section really needs paraphrasing. It is mostly an exact copy of the cited source, and is, like the source, poorly written. -- ♦♦♦Vlmastra♦♦♦ ( talk) 04:33, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
I think this article has some copyright violations (using write ups from other websites) and there are WP:POV issues. Kleomarlo ( talk) 11:17, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
-synonyms? -Description- 2 refs -expand Diet? -Drink? -Conservation checkthrough -more R w. humans Rufous-crowned Sparrow ( talk) 03:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Philippine Eagle (Pithecophaga jefferyi).jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests March 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 14:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:Philippine Eagle.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests March 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 15:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC) |
Has the range of this Eagle contracted as it has become rarer? If so, what are the areas where it used to live? Snowman ( talk) 17:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Other than measurements meant to claim largest, longest and other superlatives, there seem to be no standard morphometrics for wing bill etc. These need to be filled in with proper referencing. An old source for a few measurements below, others have been added to the article. Shyamal ( talk) 11:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Question: Is there a "Standard" way of measurement to follow as a general rule in obtaining the specimens measurement or a consensus among Biologist, Ornithologist, scientist and experts etc. to consider that the manner of measurement is correct or acceptable to all? IF there is none existing which one is to follow as "Standard" the British ornithologist or U.S. Ornithologist or other Ornithological organization?
I think IF the result of the measurements is significantly huge as compared to the other specimen used in a experiment for example an eagles tarsi which is one of the easiest body part for any Biologist to take measurement which is directly comparable.
Tarsus (Foot length) 1. Haring Ibon = 145 mm 2. Harpy Eagle = 121.25 mm 3. Kenyan Eagle = 115 mm 4. Golden Eagle = 110 mm 5. American Bald Eagle = 95 mm
Source: link
Isn't it that this kind of results is conclusive enough to consider that you could actually use superlative adjectives like "Longest"? BTW I like the latest version you did to the Philippine eagles description rest a sure that I wont make any changes to it. Informaticz ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC).
Okay, let's see what's out there.... Casliber ( talk · contribs) 13:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
1. Title: Spizaetus hawk-eagles as predators of arboreal colobines Author(s): Fam SD, Nijman V Source: PRIMATES Volume: 52 Issue: 2 Pages: 105-110 Published: APR 2011 Times Cited: 0
2. Title: DNA barcodes of Philippine accipitrids Author(s): Ong PS, Luczon AU, Quilang JP, et al. Source: MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES Volume: 11 Issue: 2 Pages: 245-254 Published: MAR 2011 Times Cited: 0
3. Title: Convergent evolution and paraphyly of the hawk-eagles of the genus Spizaetus (Aves, Accipitridae) - phylogenetic analyses based on mitochondrial markers Author(s): Haring E, Kvaloy K, Gjershaug JO, et al. Source: JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGICAL SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTIONARY RESEARCH Volume: 45 Issue: 4 Pages: 353-365 Published: NOV 2007 Times Cited: 4
4. Title: A modified bal-chatri to capture Great Philippine Eagles for radiotelemetry Author(s): Miranda HC, Ibanez JC Source: JOURNAL OF RAPTOR RESEARCH Volume: 40 Issue: 3 Pages: 235-237 Published: SEP 2006 Times Cited: 0
5. Title: Notes on the breeding behavior of a Philippine Eagle pair at Mount Sinaka, Central Mindanao Author(s): Ibanez JC, Miranda HC, Balaquit-Ibanez G, et al. Source: WILSON BULLETIN Volume: 115 Issue: 3 Pages: 333-336 Published: SEP 2003 Times Cited: 1
6. Title: Distribution and nesting density of the Philippine Eagle Pithecophaga jefferyi on Mindanao Island, Philippines: what do we know after 100 years? Author(s): Bueser GLL, Bueser KG, Afan DS, et al. Source: IBIS Volume: 145 Issue: 1 Pages: 130-135 Published: JAN 2003 Times Cited: 4
7. Title: Summary of Philippine Eagle reproductive success, 1978-98 Author(s): Miranda HC, Salvador DI, Ibanez JC, et al. Source: JOURNAL OF RAPTOR RESEARCH Volume: 34 Issue: 1 Pages: 37-41 Published: MAR 2000 Times Cited: 4
8. Title: Redescription of Phagicola pithecophagicola Faust, 1920 (Digenea : Heterophyidae), the type species of Phagicola Faust 1920 Author(s): Scholz T Source: JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY Volume: 85 Issue: 1 Pages: 111-114 Published: FEB 1999 Times Cited: 0
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Philippine eagle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
There is a claim this eagle is largest by both size and wing span, there are mentions of 2 other heavier eagles. The Wedge Tailed eagle is also listed on Wikipedia as being longer than this eagle by about 4cm.
I guess i am suggesting that perhaps the statement about size should be cut back and remove the claim about length. (Unless of course someone can actually back up the claims of the true 'longest' eagle)... Alex m baker ( talk) 09:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Philippine eagle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
@ Kurt247: please do not add further irrelevant chitchat about that eagle pair to the page, or restore the removed section. Not only is this stuff not referenced to reliable sources, but even if it were, this article is not the place to document cutesy "slice of life" factoids about celebrity birds. This is an encyclopedia, not a gossip blog. The material already present under Philippine_eagle#Philippine_Eagle_Diplomacy is quite sufficient. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 12:22, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Philippine eagle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Can somebody improve the "Relationship With Humans" section? I am not sure what the author meant. Is it about the way captive Philippine Eagles imprint their caretakers as surrogate mates? That would be an interesting section. The current one talks only about presidential proclamations, certainly not about relationship with humans.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by TheOneWithTheDeerOnIt ( talk • contribs) 16:05, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
This bird is not Critically endangered. They have improved since last time which only had about less then 100 but now it's like alot now. Also, about changing the name, it should be Philippine Eagle since it can only be found in the Philippines! If it's some where in another countries I will accept in changing it but since you can only find it in parts of Philippines then I believe people can and should call it Philippine Eagle!
Also about that carabao you are talking about. Obviously we can't call Water buffalo our own name for it because you can find water buffalos in other parts of asia. We can't call it ours not like the Philippine Eagle which is only found in the Philippines. Same goes for SAMPAGUITA. You can find that flower in other countries so we can't own it by naming it the official name as SAMPAGUITA for everyone!
If you are complaining that we shouldn't name it as an english word then I believe you should call it Haring Ibon or Haribon instead if you don't like it being called by an english name like Philippine Eagle.
210.185.184.98 12:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC) Well, i may be not the best person to tell about the Haribon. But I beg to disagree with calling it the Philippine Eagle. There is no English common name for this bird. The term Philippine Eagle is nothing but an invention. I believe that as the English speaknig world accepted to use the word 'CONDOR' (from Quechua) rather than 'HAWK', they begin to accept the natinve name we gave to our national bird.
After all, unlike the 'CARABAO', there is no other country in the world that claims the 'HARIBON' to be a symbol of their national pride. If someone argues that the 'HARIBON' has an existing English name, I suggest that we change the name of 'SAMPAGUITA' into 'ARABIC JASMINE'. Well, that is just a reaction. Thank you. NASUGBU BATANGAS 210.185.184.98 12:31, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
I've always known and heard it as "Philippine Eagle". And I think it is the widely known name for it. So I vote we keep it that way
192.146.101.24 07:15, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
What is meant by "this country" at the end of Unique Evolutionary History? I presume it means the Philippenes but it is not clear at first glance. It could potentially be interpreted as the country in which the writer is situated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoyo1505 ( talk • contribs) 10:24, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I think it's clearly talking about the Country - Philippines, for it's obvious, the eagle specie aa named "Philippine eagle." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.69.49.198 ( talk) 10:50, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
The 'unique evoltutionary history' section really needs paraphrasing. It is mostly an exact copy of the cited source, and is, like the source, poorly written. -- ♦♦♦Vlmastra♦♦♦ ( talk) 04:33, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
I think this article has some copyright violations (using write ups from other websites) and there are WP:POV issues. Kleomarlo ( talk) 11:17, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
-synonyms? -Description- 2 refs -expand Diet? -Drink? -Conservation checkthrough -more R w. humans Rufous-crowned Sparrow ( talk) 03:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Philippine Eagle (Pithecophaga jefferyi).jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests March 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 14:55, 26 May 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article,
File:Philippine Eagle.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests March 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 15:03, 26 May 2011 (UTC) |
Has the range of this Eagle contracted as it has become rarer? If so, what are the areas where it used to live? Snowman ( talk) 17:43, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Other than measurements meant to claim largest, longest and other superlatives, there seem to be no standard morphometrics for wing bill etc. These need to be filled in with proper referencing. An old source for a few measurements below, others have been added to the article. Shyamal ( talk) 11:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Question: Is there a "Standard" way of measurement to follow as a general rule in obtaining the specimens measurement or a consensus among Biologist, Ornithologist, scientist and experts etc. to consider that the manner of measurement is correct or acceptable to all? IF there is none existing which one is to follow as "Standard" the British ornithologist or U.S. Ornithologist or other Ornithological organization?
I think IF the result of the measurements is significantly huge as compared to the other specimen used in a experiment for example an eagles tarsi which is one of the easiest body part for any Biologist to take measurement which is directly comparable.
Tarsus (Foot length) 1. Haring Ibon = 145 mm 2. Harpy Eagle = 121.25 mm 3. Kenyan Eagle = 115 mm 4. Golden Eagle = 110 mm 5. American Bald Eagle = 95 mm
Source: link
Isn't it that this kind of results is conclusive enough to consider that you could actually use superlative adjectives like "Longest"? BTW I like the latest version you did to the Philippine eagles description rest a sure that I wont make any changes to it. Informaticz ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC).
Okay, let's see what's out there.... Casliber ( talk · contribs) 13:31, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
1. Title: Spizaetus hawk-eagles as predators of arboreal colobines Author(s): Fam SD, Nijman V Source: PRIMATES Volume: 52 Issue: 2 Pages: 105-110 Published: APR 2011 Times Cited: 0
2. Title: DNA barcodes of Philippine accipitrids Author(s): Ong PS, Luczon AU, Quilang JP, et al. Source: MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES Volume: 11 Issue: 2 Pages: 245-254 Published: MAR 2011 Times Cited: 0
3. Title: Convergent evolution and paraphyly of the hawk-eagles of the genus Spizaetus (Aves, Accipitridae) - phylogenetic analyses based on mitochondrial markers Author(s): Haring E, Kvaloy K, Gjershaug JO, et al. Source: JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGICAL SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTIONARY RESEARCH Volume: 45 Issue: 4 Pages: 353-365 Published: NOV 2007 Times Cited: 4
4. Title: A modified bal-chatri to capture Great Philippine Eagles for radiotelemetry Author(s): Miranda HC, Ibanez JC Source: JOURNAL OF RAPTOR RESEARCH Volume: 40 Issue: 3 Pages: 235-237 Published: SEP 2006 Times Cited: 0
5. Title: Notes on the breeding behavior of a Philippine Eagle pair at Mount Sinaka, Central Mindanao Author(s): Ibanez JC, Miranda HC, Balaquit-Ibanez G, et al. Source: WILSON BULLETIN Volume: 115 Issue: 3 Pages: 333-336 Published: SEP 2003 Times Cited: 1
6. Title: Distribution and nesting density of the Philippine Eagle Pithecophaga jefferyi on Mindanao Island, Philippines: what do we know after 100 years? Author(s): Bueser GLL, Bueser KG, Afan DS, et al. Source: IBIS Volume: 145 Issue: 1 Pages: 130-135 Published: JAN 2003 Times Cited: 4
7. Title: Summary of Philippine Eagle reproductive success, 1978-98 Author(s): Miranda HC, Salvador DI, Ibanez JC, et al. Source: JOURNAL OF RAPTOR RESEARCH Volume: 34 Issue: 1 Pages: 37-41 Published: MAR 2000 Times Cited: 4
8. Title: Redescription of Phagicola pithecophagicola Faust, 1920 (Digenea : Heterophyidae), the type species of Phagicola Faust 1920 Author(s): Scholz T Source: JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY Volume: 85 Issue: 1 Pages: 111-114 Published: FEB 1999 Times Cited: 0
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Philippine eagle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
There is a claim this eagle is largest by both size and wing span, there are mentions of 2 other heavier eagles. The Wedge Tailed eagle is also listed on Wikipedia as being longer than this eagle by about 4cm.
I guess i am suggesting that perhaps the statement about size should be cut back and remove the claim about length. (Unless of course someone can actually back up the claims of the true 'longest' eagle)... Alex m baker ( talk) 09:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Philippine eagle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
@ Kurt247: please do not add further irrelevant chitchat about that eagle pair to the page, or restore the removed section. Not only is this stuff not referenced to reliable sources, but even if it were, this article is not the place to document cutesy "slice of life" factoids about celebrity birds. This is an encyclopedia, not a gossip blog. The material already present under Philippine_eagle#Philippine_Eagle_Diplomacy is quite sufficient. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 12:22, 7 September 2023 (UTC)