 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
The official document Philippine Health Insurance Corporation
- Republic Act 7875 also known as National Health Insurance Act of 1995
http://www.philhealth.gov.ph/about_us/others/ra7875.pdf
- IMPLEMENTING RULES AND REGULATIONS of the National Health Insurance Act of 1995 (Republic Act 7875 as Amended by Republic Act 9241)
http://www.philhealth.gov.ph/about_us/others/irr2004.pdf
Please help me cite and make reference on the article.
Bonvallite ( talk) 10:40, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Why is this article here? Please explain. Seriously dudes, this article is very much better suited for WikiPilipinas instead. Zollerriia63 ( talk) 12:55, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hm? Isn't PhilHealth notable enough to earn a Wikipedia article? -- Sky Harbor ( talk) 22:29, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: No consensus. ( non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 13:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Philippine Health Insurance Corporation →
PhilHealth – More recognizable, common, and concise. Present article name (or the abbreviation PHIC) is hardly used outside of government or official contexts.
TagaSanPedroAko (
talk) 08:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC) —Relisting.
b
uidh
e 15:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose There is a long-standing convention to use full names for articles involving government agencies (the only exception being made for PAGASA, and that's for length reasons), while using the common name in the article body and as a redirect to the article. If the issue is recognizability, the current convention addresses that by using "PhilHealth" in the article body. -- Sky Harbor ( talk) 22:12, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- I'm fine with using the full name on articles of government departments/ministries or agencies (per WP:NCGAL), but possibly not for most government-owned corporations/companies (like this) where WP:NCCORP guidelines can be used as well, though I still agree this'll be a balancing act given the context. TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 22:08, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Split and transfer information on the insurance program to PhilHealth. I believe as far as readers are concerned, the insurance program is the primary topic for this search term, not the company or govt agency that runs the program.-- RioHondo ( talk) 17:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Do you mean a scenario like in the the case for US Medicare and Medicaid? If that's so, that's another possibility we might pursue. TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 00:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
As suggested by User:RioHondo, I propose that content about the Health insurance program be split into a separate page called PhilHealth. As said back on the move proposal, The primary topic of this page is about the government-owned health insurance company, and the content about the insurance program (PhilHealth) must be separate, much like the case with the US Medicare/Medicaid, where the government corporations that provide them are covered separately, and the insurance schemes have their own articles. TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 21:43, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
I think it should not be splitted. Since the program of Philhealth is health insurance. Thus its governing body. Bonvallite ( talk) 05:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Can I ask if I'm registered in Phil health 119.94.182.209 ( talk) 12:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Rjay Andra nuñez Oct 10 1999 203.177.48.58 ( talk) 10:32, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
The official document Philippine Health Insurance Corporation
- Republic Act 7875 also known as National Health Insurance Act of 1995
http://www.philhealth.gov.ph/about_us/others/ra7875.pdf
- IMPLEMENTING RULES AND REGULATIONS of the National Health Insurance Act of 1995 (Republic Act 7875 as Amended by Republic Act 9241)
http://www.philhealth.gov.ph/about_us/others/irr2004.pdf
Please help me cite and make reference on the article.
Bonvallite ( talk) 10:40, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Why is this article here? Please explain. Seriously dudes, this article is very much better suited for WikiPilipinas instead. Zollerriia63 ( talk) 12:55, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hm? Isn't PhilHealth notable enough to earn a Wikipedia article? -- Sky Harbor ( talk) 22:29, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: No consensus. ( non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 13:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Philippine Health Insurance Corporation →
PhilHealth – More recognizable, common, and concise. Present article name (or the abbreviation PHIC) is hardly used outside of government or official contexts.
TagaSanPedroAko (
talk) 08:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC) —Relisting.
b
uidh
e 15:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose There is a long-standing convention to use full names for articles involving government agencies (the only exception being made for PAGASA, and that's for length reasons), while using the common name in the article body and as a redirect to the article. If the issue is recognizability, the current convention addresses that by using "PhilHealth" in the article body. -- Sky Harbor ( talk) 22:12, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- I'm fine with using the full name on articles of government departments/ministries or agencies (per WP:NCGAL), but possibly not for most government-owned corporations/companies (like this) where WP:NCCORP guidelines can be used as well, though I still agree this'll be a balancing act given the context. TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 22:08, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
- Split and transfer information on the insurance program to PhilHealth. I believe as far as readers are concerned, the insurance program is the primary topic for this search term, not the company or govt agency that runs the program.-- RioHondo ( talk) 17:44, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Do you mean a scenario like in the the case for US Medicare and Medicaid? If that's so, that's another possibility we might pursue. TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 00:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
As suggested by User:RioHondo, I propose that content about the Health insurance program be split into a separate page called PhilHealth. As said back on the move proposal, The primary topic of this page is about the government-owned health insurance company, and the content about the insurance program (PhilHealth) must be separate, much like the case with the US Medicare/Medicaid, where the government corporations that provide them are covered separately, and the insurance schemes have their own articles. TagaSanPedroAko ( talk) 21:43, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
I think it should not be splitted. Since the program of Philhealth is health insurance. Thus its governing body. Bonvallite ( talk) 05:16, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
Can I ask if I'm registered in Phil health 119.94.182.209 ( talk) 12:11, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Rjay Andra nuñez Oct 10 1999 203.177.48.58 ( talk) 10:32, 22 January 2023 (UTC)