This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Folklore This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted on 8 January 2021 by reviewer UnitedStatesian ( talk · contribs).

I've reverted Levanven60's recent edits, which copied content unattributed from the Manohara article. This appears to be an attempt to create "Peacock Princess" as an umbrella term of for several related stories, but this does not appear to be supported by sources, which only use the term to describe the tale as found by Tai groups in China. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 17:46, 31 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Levanven60, you're making wholesale reversions to the article without addressing the issues raised. Unless you respond here, I'll revert back to the earlier version from before the additions. -- Paul_012 ( talk) 09:57, 3 August 2022 (UTC) reply