This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article does not cite any sources, so it cannot be verified whether the subject is notable (or maybe is rather original research). Please add relevant references, preferably to peer-reviewed scientific publications. Google shows a number of hits for "part-whole", but this being such a general term (and me not being an expert in philosophy), I cannot judge whether they are even vaguely related with the article. -- Sorted as part of the Notability Wikiproject. -- B. Wolterding 15:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Hegel had written on whole and part and the relationship between whole and part. This needs to be covered. âPreceding unsigned comment added by 124.124.230.149 ( talk) 06:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article does not cite any sources, so it cannot be verified whether the subject is notable (or maybe is rather original research). Please add relevant references, preferably to peer-reviewed scientific publications. Google shows a number of hits for "part-whole", but this being such a general term (and me not being an expert in philosophy), I cannot judge whether they are even vaguely related with the article. -- Sorted as part of the Notability Wikiproject. -- B. Wolterding 15:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Hegel had written on whole and part and the relationship between whole and part. This needs to be covered. âPreceding unsigned comment added by 124.124.230.149 ( talk) 06:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)