From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inclusion of Ad counsel on the USA paragraph

As of Dec 28, 2016 this page includes a short two paragraphs about USA and links to the main page on USA propaganda. Given the brevity of the information displayed here, it seems inappropriate and perhaps even propagandesque to include the statement labelling the ad counsel as propaganda. I actually am not to familiar with his agency aside from several public service ads that it sponsore, but based on what is currently written on the main USA propaganda page, it seems really inappropriate to include that paragraph on this page.

It seems more like someone has personal beef with the ad counsel. When one goes to the full page on USA propaganda one see that it is actually only a random university professor claiming that it is like the propaganda arm of the USA govt. That is not clear here, this paragraph makes it seem like there is more consensus. I am going to delete the paragraph on the ad counsel. It is best left for the main page on USA propaganda, although I'd say even that is dubious without more support. 98.210.100.124 ( talk)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:37, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Political Communication

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2023 and 17 March 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LaurenLainez, Ccgx29, Ecpat838 ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: 10Adrian, Tdinello, Beyonce0414.

— Assignment last updated by Nikkig1221 ( talk) 04:18, 20 February 2023 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Inclusion of Ad counsel on the USA paragraph

As of Dec 28, 2016 this page includes a short two paragraphs about USA and links to the main page on USA propaganda. Given the brevity of the information displayed here, it seems inappropriate and perhaps even propagandesque to include the statement labelling the ad counsel as propaganda. I actually am not to familiar with his agency aside from several public service ads that it sponsore, but based on what is currently written on the main USA propaganda page, it seems really inappropriate to include that paragraph on this page.

It seems more like someone has personal beef with the ad counsel. When one goes to the full page on USA propaganda one see that it is actually only a random university professor claiming that it is like the propaganda arm of the USA govt. That is not clear here, this paragraph makes it seem like there is more consensus. I am going to delete the paragraph on the ad counsel. It is best left for the main page on USA propaganda, although I'd say even that is dubious without more support. 98.210.100.124 ( talk)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:37, 31 December 2022 (UTC) reply

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Political Communication

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2023 and 17 March 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LaurenLainez, Ccgx29, Ecpat838 ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: 10Adrian, Tdinello, Beyonce0414.

— Assignment last updated by Nikkig1221 ( talk) 04:18, 20 February 2023 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook