This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Outsider art article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
"Glam rock" is included under "See also."
Does Outsider Art have anything to do with glam rock? Neither article mentions the other. 2603:7000:873F:899F:B508:DD31:588:728D ( talk) 21:05, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Hey,
Recently I've noticed that Art Brut does not have it's own page and instead re-directs here. Art Brut is a historically significant art term and should have it's own page rather than a re-direct. I've also noticed that much of the content in the Outsider Art page is based on Art Brut -- so I'd like to split hairs here a bit so that a significant movement like Art Brut, isn't overshadowed by the ease of language by calling it outsider art. Doing some research and will see the best way to split these two. Thoughts? Slacker13 ( talk) 15:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Art Brut -- as a term came first and was coined by Jean Dubuffet and is centered mainly on child-like naive, primitive works where as ...
Outsider Art -- is ANY art that is created by someone untrained outside of the traditional art world. Slacker13 ( talk) 15:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Particularly "Prinz, Jesse. "Against outsider art." Journal of Social Philosophy 48.3 (2017): 250-272. [1]".
Is there anything that can be done about it? I'd love to read up on it.
Thanks. EnviousBird ( talk) 18:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Outsider art article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the
Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
"Glam rock" is included under "See also."
Does Outsider Art have anything to do with glam rock? Neither article mentions the other. 2603:7000:873F:899F:B508:DD31:588:728D ( talk) 21:05, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Hey,
Recently I've noticed that Art Brut does not have it's own page and instead re-directs here. Art Brut is a historically significant art term and should have it's own page rather than a re-direct. I've also noticed that much of the content in the Outsider Art page is based on Art Brut -- so I'd like to split hairs here a bit so that a significant movement like Art Brut, isn't overshadowed by the ease of language by calling it outsider art. Doing some research and will see the best way to split these two. Thoughts? Slacker13 ( talk) 15:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Art Brut -- as a term came first and was coined by Jean Dubuffet and is centered mainly on child-like naive, primitive works where as ...
Outsider Art -- is ANY art that is created by someone untrained outside of the traditional art world. Slacker13 ( talk) 15:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Particularly "Prinz, Jesse. "Against outsider art." Journal of Social Philosophy 48.3 (2017): 250-272. [1]".
Is there anything that can be done about it? I'd love to read up on it.
Thanks. EnviousBird ( talk) 18:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)