Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 07:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

When an article has this few issues, it merits a quick pass where I make the copy changes! Sammi Brie (she/her •  t • c) 07:53, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Copy changes

• Add comma after Martínez limited himself to local politics until 2009
• Should "in as much" be "inasmuch"?
• Martínez reproached the MNR, and was reincorporated into its ranks Remove this comma (CinS). Also seems like reproached is not the right word in English; it would be the opposite. Maybe reapproached (which is what I tried)

Sourcing and spot checks

Earwig turns up no issues.

• 2: Gonzales Salas p. 29 checks out for all three claims it's used for. Y
• 9: esa actitud es calificada por sus disidentes como “funcional” al partido de gobierno. Y
• 10 La diputada Piérola, por su parte, mostró su disgusto ante estas designaciones, debido a que la “otra corriente” de CN en Diputados la designó a ella como su jefa de bancada. Y
• 16: It took a bit of poking around to figure out what was being said here, but I finally was able to piece it together in the source. Not terribly intuitive. Y
• 19: Percentage is correct. Y

Images

Just one, the CC-licensed headshot.