Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie ( talk · contribs) 03:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR): d ( copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Give it a once-over; it's been a while. Alt text and some copy tweaks are all you need. 7-day hold to Krisgabwoosh. Sammi Brie (she/her •  t • c) 03:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Copy changes

Early life

• During the democratic administration of Hugo Banzer Is this intended to be a capital-D Democratic of some sort?
  • Banzer was a military dictator in the 1970s before being democratically elected in the late 1990s. Given the connotations of collaborating with a military regime, Bolivian outlets tend to note when someone was in official during his later democratic government. Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 05:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Senators

• Morales' should be "Morales's", MOS:'S. This occurs one or two more places in the article including with the name "Costas'"
  •  Done in all areas. Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 05:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
• approval of two-thirds . Something missing here?
  • How about necessitated two-thirds majority approval? Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 05:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
• In May 2013, the three main organizations presented a merger request to the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE), which rejected it on the grounds that the law only allowed political parties to be fused, not civic groups. To circumvent this, Ortiz's party requested authorization from the TSE to legally change its name from Popular Consensus to Social Democratic Movement, which was accepted. How does the name change change its status?
  • It didn't really. CP was already nationally registered, so it was just re-registered under the new name. The other two organizations, presumably, simply dissolved themselves and merged internally, but that's not explicitly stated in the source. Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 05:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
• The FRI's rejected this option Something's missing or the 's should be gone.
  • Removed
• Doria Medina publicized he and his party's decision should be "his and his party's decision"
  •  Done Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 05:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Minister of Economy

• Footnote [e] has a typo: "Oritz"
  • Corrected. 05:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Sourcing and spot checks

Earwig reveals no issues.

11 references were chosen out of the 113:

• 1: In the infobox for the 2020 resignation from MDS. Mark url-status=dead. Looks like Unitel redid their site and links like that point to the home page. Y
  • Marked as dead along with other citations. Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 05:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply
• 34: Defection of Ortiz and others to form Consenso Popular. Y
• 35: Preview of paywalled article contains the 11 figure. Y
• 44: Name change of party. Y
• 62: Announcement of BDN ticket. Y
• 64: Mentions Ortiz being in Brazil when Rodríguez resigned. Y
• 69: Mentions one legislator's defection. I presume most of the rest of the claims are in [68]. Y
• 81: With 82, mentions the deal and the lack of Morales. Y
• 107: Ni siquiera Oscar Ortiz -que es el candidato más liberal- Y
• 111, 112: Electoral list percentages match those provided in the Atlas electoral de Bolivia. Y

Other items

• The article contains nine images, all libre licensed. None have alt text.
  • Added alt text. Krisgabwoosh ( talk) 05:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC) reply