This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. France Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article incorporates text from Orthodox Church of the Gauls at OrthodoxWiki under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. Prior to November 22, 2005, OrthodoxWiki content was only available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 license, which is unacceptably restrictive for Wikipedia. After that date, all content is dual-licensed under the GFDL and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 license. This means the text is usable under whichever of the two licenses is most acceptable. Nearly all currently active editors who had contributed to OrthodoxWiki prior to that date have agreed to the relicensing of their older material. See the Copyrights page at OrthodoxWiki for more details.

A blog post includes text purportedly written by Abba Markos, Metropolitan of the French Coptic Orthodox Church, that informs about a notice of excommunication by Pope Shenouda III of Alexandria of seven priests and their adherents from the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria.

According to the blog author, for continued use of the rite of Gaul ("le rite des Gaules") after request to stop celebrating a Western rite not recognized by the Coptic Patriarchate of Alexandria.

The French language blog post fits the narrative already included in the article but needs a better source to meet WP:BLP. – BoBoMisiu ( talk) 00:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC) reply

According to fr:Abbaye royale Saint-Michel de Bois-Aubry on the French Wikipedia the group associated with the Orthodox Church of the Gauls occupied the property until 2006. The abbayedeboisaubry.fr site states that the "SCI de l'Eglise Orthodoxe de France" and "l'Association Cultuelle Catholique et Orthodoxe de l’Abbaye Saint-Michel et St Martin" aquired the property in 1978. And the current owner acquired the abbey property in September 2006. – BoBoMisiu ( talk) 01:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC) reply

As far as I'm aware, all of the above is true but this doesn't seem in any way pertinent to the article. The Monastery of St Michael & St Martin still exists, even though it no longer owns the physical property known as "l'Abbaye royale Saint-Michel de Bois-Aubry". The monastery is, in fact, in buildings directly across the street. I do not know what the arrangement is that permits their continued use of the buildings but as it doesn't seem relevant to the article I have removed the references to ownership of the property. Bertelin ( talk) 18:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Bertelin: of course it is pertinent because they left in 2006 – 10 years ago. They moved across the street but still identify with property they neither own nor occupy. – BoBoMisiu ( talk) 21:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your response, @ BoBoMisiu:. Thank you, as well, for your help in bringing this article up to a food standard. It seems that they have taken the name as the name of their own monastery. Therefore, regardless of their location, or who owns the property that they use, the name of their monastery is unaffected. The fact that they once owned the historic Abbaye might be an interesting fact to mention, but it seems not a primary part of their current identity and ought not to feature so prominently, if at all. What do you think? Bertelin ( talk) 21:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC) reply

I have edited this section so that it includes a reference to the community's previous ownership of the historic buildings without making this a primary part of their identification. I hope that this compromise proves helpful. Bertelin ( talk) 22:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC) reply

@ Bertelin: I prefer the term organized over formed in the lede because ÉOG is, according to the online court registrar of the Tribunaux de commerce, an association déclarée that received a SIREN number (a French business identification number) in November 2006 – that is when it became a registered French business. [1] The term formed is less precise than organized or registered.

I prefer "is splinter group separated from" over "has its origins in" because ÉOG is a schism or separation from ÉOF and not a constituent part of ÉOF.

I also think the lede should have a footnote to distinguish between the landmark Abbaye royale Saint-Michel de Bois-Aubry [ fr and the ÉOG monastery, i.e. "Abbaye Saint Michel et Saint Martin", across the street. It is quite obvious from this photo (on eglise-orthodoxe.eu) depicting the landmark Abbaye royale Saint-Michel de Bois-Aubry that two are being confused – the title includes "Abbaye de Bois-Aubry". See this page (on eglise-orthodoxe.eu) for how "Abbaye Saint Michel et Saint Martin" and "Abbaye de Bois-Aubry" are arranged in the address on that page. A Google search for "Abbaye de Bois-Aubry" shows results for the landmark Abbaye royale Saint-Michel de Bois-Aubry. – BoBoMisiu ( talk) 16:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC) reply

I can find no reference to this at all on Google, except to this article or versions thereof. -- 142.163.195.86 ( talk) 16:43, 8 December 2020 (UTC) reply