A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article. |
Nurture (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 1, 2024. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Porter Robinson chose the title
Nurture for his second album due to its evocation of the word nature and as a reference to the
nature versus nurture debate? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article was nominated for merging with Unfold (song) on July 25, 2023. The result of the discussion was Not merged — withdrawn. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
The result of the move request was: page moved. This would have been a move request I would have accepted if it were posted on WP:RMTR due to the obvious WP:PRECISE issue, so oage move and request closed early due to the technical nature of this move. ( non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 00:29, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Nurture (Porter Robinson album) → Nurture (album) – Name not necessary for further disambiguation if Nurture (album) is available. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 22:56, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
It's safe to say the article's at C-class now. I think I'll check it against the B-class criteria later this week. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 17:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
@
36.90.158.136 and
Binksternet: It seems we have a disagreement over whether or not the
shoegaze genre should be mentioned in the infobox. The citation which actually is supposed to verify it is
this The Fader article ("He flips through sounds and styles — delirious shoegaze...
"). Binksternet also noted that it's mentioned in
the Pitchfork review ("...blissed-out digital shoegaze (the Totally Enormous Extinct Dinosaurs collaboration 'Unfold')...
". So while 'Unfold' is, of course, the best example of a shoegaze-like style on the album, it's not the only one. I interpret the language of both of these sources as making more general comments on the stylistic aspects of the album; both of them acknowledge that the work incorporates stylistic influences from several genres, including shoegaze. I'd love to hear what you two think about this, and hopefully we can come to a
consensus on this before making any more reverts. —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh) 06:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
a grab bag of song genres", but I want to note that several other genres are mentioned in reliable sources with only about the same strength as shoegaze, the ambient and electropop ones in particular. You can see the citations that verify them in this revision. I don't mean to distract from the topic of this discussion, but if you have an issue with how the genres are mentioned in the sources, we have to apply that standard to all of them. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 23:34, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29
talk 21:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by TechnoSquirrel69 ( talk). Self-nominated at 02:18, 30 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Nurture (album); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Thank you for your submission! According to the article's history, it's been promoted to GA status eight days before this nomination, which would make him uneligible by just a single day (DYK noms need to be submitted at last one week since being created/expanded/promoted). I don't know if we can make any exceptions to the rule, but I would definitely be disappointed to discard your entry, because it looks promising... Anyway, if we're still able to accept the entry, I would suggest you to write one or two more hooks about other aspects that could be even more interesting: for example, I would look at the fact that the album title is a nod to the nature versus nurture debate. First, though, let's wait for the green or red light. Oltrepier ( talk) 16:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
The seven-day limit can be extended for a day or two upon requestand even if it didn't say that, I'd be inclined to WP:IAR on this. And thank you to Oltrepier both for being careful enough to verify the age and for being reasonable enough to seek verification. RoySmith (talk) 17:44, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article. |
Nurture (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
February 1, 2024. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Porter Robinson chose the title
Nurture for his second album due to its evocation of the word nature and as a reference to the
nature versus nurture debate? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article was nominated for merging with Unfold (song) on July 25, 2023. The result of the discussion was Not merged — withdrawn. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
The result of the move request was: page moved. This would have been a move request I would have accepted if it were posted on WP:RMTR due to the obvious WP:PRECISE issue, so oage move and request closed early due to the technical nature of this move. ( non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 00:29, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
Nurture (Porter Robinson album) → Nurture (album) – Name not necessary for further disambiguation if Nurture (album) is available. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 22:56, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
It's safe to say the article's at C-class now. I think I'll check it against the B-class criteria later this week. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 17:20, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
@
36.90.158.136 and
Binksternet: It seems we have a disagreement over whether or not the
shoegaze genre should be mentioned in the infobox. The citation which actually is supposed to verify it is
this The Fader article ("He flips through sounds and styles — delirious shoegaze...
"). Binksternet also noted that it's mentioned in
the Pitchfork review ("...blissed-out digital shoegaze (the Totally Enormous Extinct Dinosaurs collaboration 'Unfold')...
". So while 'Unfold' is, of course, the best example of a shoegaze-like style on the album, it's not the only one. I interpret the language of both of these sources as making more general comments on the stylistic aspects of the album; both of them acknowledge that the work incorporates stylistic influences from several genres, including shoegaze. I'd love to hear what you two think about this, and hopefully we can come to a
consensus on this before making any more reverts. —
TechnoSquirrel69 (
sigh) 06:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
a grab bag of song genres", but I want to note that several other genres are mentioned in reliable sources with only about the same strength as shoegaze, the ambient and electropop ones in particular. You can see the citations that verify them in this revision. I don't mean to distract from the topic of this discussion, but if you have an issue with how the genres are mentioned in the sources, we have to apply that standard to all of them. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 23:34, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
AirshipJungleman29
talk 21:54, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by TechnoSquirrel69 ( talk). Self-nominated at 02:18, 30 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Nurture (album); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: None required. |
Overall: Thank you for your submission! According to the article's history, it's been promoted to GA status eight days before this nomination, which would make him uneligible by just a single day (DYK noms need to be submitted at last one week since being created/expanded/promoted). I don't know if we can make any exceptions to the rule, but I would definitely be disappointed to discard your entry, because it looks promising... Anyway, if we're still able to accept the entry, I would suggest you to write one or two more hooks about other aspects that could be even more interesting: for example, I would look at the fact that the album title is a nod to the nature versus nurture debate. First, though, let's wait for the green or red light. Oltrepier ( talk) 16:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
The seven-day limit can be extended for a day or two upon requestand even if it didn't say that, I'd be inclined to WP:IAR on this. And thank you to Oltrepier both for being careful enough to verify the age and for being reasonable enough to seek verification. RoySmith (talk) 17:44, 1 January 2024 (UTC)