New Jersey Route 59 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to the SLD and the picture in the article, NJ 59 is a north-south road. Therefore, the route description needs to be flipped to describe the route in this manner. Dough4872 ( talk) 01:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Reviewer: Wizardman 03:36, 27 November 2009 (UTC) The article is nice, though I was originally concerned about how short it was, despite the fact that it is indeed the shortest NJ state route. I'll pass it since there's not really anything that could be added; not much you can do with a .15 mi road. I'd ask for a map addition, but it's not a requirement given how short the road is. Wizardman 03:36, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New Jersey Route 59. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
New Jersey Route 59 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to the SLD and the picture in the article, NJ 59 is a north-south road. Therefore, the route description needs to be flipped to describe the route in this manner. Dough4872 ( talk) 01:20, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Reviewer: Wizardman 03:36, 27 November 2009 (UTC) The article is nice, though I was originally concerned about how short it was, despite the fact that it is indeed the shortest NJ state route. I'll pass it since there's not really anything that could be added; not much you can do with a .15 mi road. I'd ask for a map addition, but it's not a requirement given how short the road is. Wizardman 03:36, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New Jersey Route 59. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)