Nemesis Reborn has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 12, 2013. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Nemesis Reborn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I began work at the beginning of this article with a few minor revisions, hoping that standards would improve as the page progressed. I still have not made it to the end of the page yet, but I think it's safe to assume my hopes were in vain..?! The harder I look, the more problems I encounter, mainly with syntactical inaccuracies and grammatical gremlins. After making a few necessary changes to maintain the illusion that the piece was written by adults(!), I found it too difficult to fit it all together again without substantial re-writing. I hate having to be so fundamentally ruthless with articles that other people have spent so much time and effort creating (I specialise in the small, quick spelling corrections these days B-p) - and additionally I understand that the majority of contributors to this particular page are likely to be young people, who I would hate to discourage from future edits - so I have left well alone for now! If anyone else wishes to take it on (anyone?!) I offer you thanks and good luck. If, however, it's going to be left to me to make the changes, could I please have some reassurance that there is a consensus of opinion here, and that I'm doing the right thing?
Many thanks. Codeye ( talk) 04:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mdann52 ( talk · contribs) 12:18, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Clear pass - well done! -- Mdann 52 talk to me! 12:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
I've just reverted several edits. It looks like user 86.131.147.168 added a note to say the ride was closing (with no source, and I can't find any mention of it on the internet anywhere), and the page was subsequently blanked by user 31.54.153.79. User 86.131.147.168 then re-added the infobox and the first section, which has since been cleaned up slightly by a few bots. I've reverted to the version before all this vandalism. 128.243.2.33 ( talk) 12:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nemesis (roller coaster). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.parkworld-online.com/news/archivestory.php/aid/1781/New_naked_rollercoaster_record%21.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.parkworld-online.com/news/archivestory.php/aid/353/UK_parks_under_the_spotlight.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nemesis (roller coaster). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
@ GoneIn60 The part about Nemesis Sub-Terra reopening belongs in the retracking section because Merlin used Sub-Terra to build hype for Nemesis' reopening. WikiHmmmm... ( talk) 22:53, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi all,
please correct me if I’m wrong but I thought John Wardley designed the layout and Werner merely consulted on the technical side? HiddenHerobrine ( talk) 14:48, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Request for renaming the article under the ride's new name "Nemesis Reborn" Visokor ( talk) 13:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
WikiHmmmm..., your recent edits to the page seem to oppose renaming this article Nemesis Reborn. You seem to be suggesting a new article should be created instead. That's not how other coaster articles that have undergone refurbishments and transformations were handled (examples: New Texas Giant and Rougarou). You did bring up some valid concerns about saying Nemesis Reborn has given over 50 million rides. Statements like that need to be more carefully phrased, but that's no reason to remove everything that you did. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 04:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
... the article should be split into two segmants about the origional and reborn nemesis"
Hello.
I wondered if it should say Designer(s) John Wardley (Creative Lead) & Werner Stengel (Layout) instead of just Werner Stengel. LukeK93 ( talk) 14:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Nemesis Reborn has been listed as one of the
Sports and recreation good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: September 12, 2013. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Nemesis Reborn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I began work at the beginning of this article with a few minor revisions, hoping that standards would improve as the page progressed. I still have not made it to the end of the page yet, but I think it's safe to assume my hopes were in vain..?! The harder I look, the more problems I encounter, mainly with syntactical inaccuracies and grammatical gremlins. After making a few necessary changes to maintain the illusion that the piece was written by adults(!), I found it too difficult to fit it all together again without substantial re-writing. I hate having to be so fundamentally ruthless with articles that other people have spent so much time and effort creating (I specialise in the small, quick spelling corrections these days B-p) - and additionally I understand that the majority of contributors to this particular page are likely to be young people, who I would hate to discourage from future edits - so I have left well alone for now! If anyone else wishes to take it on (anyone?!) I offer you thanks and good luck. If, however, it's going to be left to me to make the changes, could I please have some reassurance that there is a consensus of opinion here, and that I'm doing the right thing?
Many thanks. Codeye ( talk) 04:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Mdann52 ( talk · contribs) 12:18, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Clear pass - well done! -- Mdann 52 talk to me! 12:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
I've just reverted several edits. It looks like user 86.131.147.168 added a note to say the ride was closing (with no source, and I can't find any mention of it on the internet anywhere), and the page was subsequently blanked by user 31.54.153.79. User 86.131.147.168 then re-added the infobox and the first section, which has since been cleaned up slightly by a few bots. I've reverted to the version before all this vandalism. 128.243.2.33 ( talk) 12:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Nemesis (roller coaster). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.parkworld-online.com/news/archivestory.php/aid/1781/New_naked_rollercoaster_record%21.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.parkworld-online.com/news/archivestory.php/aid/353/UK_parks_under_the_spotlight.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:55, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nemesis (roller coaster). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:30, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
@ GoneIn60 The part about Nemesis Sub-Terra reopening belongs in the retracking section because Merlin used Sub-Terra to build hype for Nemesis' reopening. WikiHmmmm... ( talk) 22:53, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi all,
please correct me if I’m wrong but I thought John Wardley designed the layout and Werner merely consulted on the technical side? HiddenHerobrine ( talk) 14:48, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Request for renaming the article under the ride's new name "Nemesis Reborn" Visokor ( talk) 13:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
WikiHmmmm..., your recent edits to the page seem to oppose renaming this article Nemesis Reborn. You seem to be suggesting a new article should be created instead. That's not how other coaster articles that have undergone refurbishments and transformations were handled (examples: New Texas Giant and Rougarou). You did bring up some valid concerns about saying Nemesis Reborn has given over 50 million rides. Statements like that need to be more carefully phrased, but that's no reason to remove everything that you did. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 04:09, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
... the article should be split into two segmants about the origional and reborn nemesis"
Hello.
I wondered if it should say Designer(s) John Wardley (Creative Lead) & Werner Stengel (Layout) instead of just Werner Stengel. LukeK93 ( talk) 14:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)