This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page should not be speedily deleted because it was not created by a banned user (I am not banned and was never banned) -- Herodes111 ( talk) 22:31, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) -- Kristijh ( talk) 22:40, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Of all idiotic reasons to remove this article, this one takes the cake. This is a very notable aircrash of a huge jet with complete loss of life aboard. And I uploaded the jet's picture earlier in anticipation of this article happening. Now I intend to add it and do other edits to make it better. Case closed. -- Mareklug talk
This article seems to imply that the absent nose cargo door may have contributed to the crash. This uninformed statement is highly misleading to say the least.
It is beyond me how it is possible to create a serious(?) encyclopedic article without known and confirmed facts and while the wreckage is still smoldering.
If this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, then please make it one. This requires careful research of the facts and accurate language. No speculation of any kind shall made it into an article.
I suggest deleting this article, because it contains mainly speculation. Even the lemma fails to mention that the article is about an airplane crash.
-- 195.246.100.57 ( talk) 12:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
There should be a picture of the explosion. That fireball was seriously cool. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.156.118.183 ( talk) 03:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
These should redirect here, being the tail number (thus identifying the particular airplane involved, just as well as the flight does), the IATA airline code and flight number (companion to the ICAO airline code and flight number redirect) and the callsign+flight number -- 65.94.76.126 ( talk) 05:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
The article states the origin as Bagram. The official site of National Air Cargo states the origin as Camp Bastian. -- Ysangkok ( talk) 17:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
IMO there should be no mention of the original operator in the article, as there is a chance some readers will draw the conclusion that it had something to do with the crash. If the investigation finds that the original operator did have something to do with the crash, then that information can be added to the article. In addition, the ref added by the same edit is from planespotters.net, which is a WP:SPS. YSSYguy ( talk) 11:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:08, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page should not be speedily deleted because it was not created by a banned user (I am not banned and was never banned) -- Herodes111 ( talk) 22:31, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) -- Kristijh ( talk) 22:40, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Of all idiotic reasons to remove this article, this one takes the cake. This is a very notable aircrash of a huge jet with complete loss of life aboard. And I uploaded the jet's picture earlier in anticipation of this article happening. Now I intend to add it and do other edits to make it better. Case closed. -- Mareklug talk
This article seems to imply that the absent nose cargo door may have contributed to the crash. This uninformed statement is highly misleading to say the least.
It is beyond me how it is possible to create a serious(?) encyclopedic article without known and confirmed facts and while the wreckage is still smoldering.
If this is supposed to be an encyclopedia, then please make it one. This requires careful research of the facts and accurate language. No speculation of any kind shall made it into an article.
I suggest deleting this article, because it contains mainly speculation. Even the lemma fails to mention that the article is about an airplane crash.
-- 195.246.100.57 ( talk) 12:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
There should be a picture of the explosion. That fireball was seriously cool. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.156.118.183 ( talk) 03:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
These should redirect here, being the tail number (thus identifying the particular airplane involved, just as well as the flight does), the IATA airline code and flight number (companion to the ICAO airline code and flight number redirect) and the callsign+flight number -- 65.94.76.126 ( talk) 05:01, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
The article states the origin as Bagram. The official site of National Air Cargo states the origin as Camp Bastian. -- Ysangkok ( talk) 17:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
IMO there should be no mention of the original operator in the article, as there is a chance some readers will draw the conclusion that it had something to do with the crash. If the investigation finds that the original operator did have something to do with the crash, then that information can be added to the article. In addition, the ref added by the same edit is from planespotters.net, which is a WP:SPS. YSSYguy ( talk) 11:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:08, 31 July 2022 (UTC)