The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Thebiguglyalien ( talk · contribs) 05:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
I'll have a review posted here shortly.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 05:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Bobamnertiopsis, the review is below. As you might have suspected, the main thing to look at is the article's length and whether its coverage is sufficient. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 06:48, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
when suddenly he and Patty appear– "suddenly" doesn't add anything and can be removed.
they slip a note purporting to be from Mr. Ratburn– This should specify that it was a romantic poem.
though not the first appearance of gay characters in an Arthur property. A 2005 episode of the spinoff show– It would be clearer if there was one sentence about Arthur and then one sentence about Postcards from Buster.
Metro is considered to be generally unreliable. The claim it supports either needs a more reliable source, or it should be removed.
Spotchecks:
This is the one we'll need to look at more closely. While a GA isn't required to be comprehensive, shorter articles are generally expected to either be expanded or to already cover everything in the sources. To start, I suggest really mining the sources that are in the article to get everything you can out of them.
A few ideas for things to look for:
I looked through a few sources, and these are the ones I found that seem to have useful info:
No ideas are given undue weight, and the article does not present its own opinions.
No disputes.
The picture is relevant and it has a non-free use rationale. If possible, it might be worth rewording the caption so it conveys the same idea without being so wordy.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Thebiguglyalien ( talk · contribs) 05:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
I'll have a review posted here shortly.
Thebiguglyalien (
talk) 05:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
Bobamnertiopsis, the review is below. As you might have suspected, the main thing to look at is the article's length and whether its coverage is sufficient. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 06:48, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
when suddenly he and Patty appear– "suddenly" doesn't add anything and can be removed.
they slip a note purporting to be from Mr. Ratburn– This should specify that it was a romantic poem.
though not the first appearance of gay characters in an Arthur property. A 2005 episode of the spinoff show– It would be clearer if there was one sentence about Arthur and then one sentence about Postcards from Buster.
Metro is considered to be generally unreliable. The claim it supports either needs a more reliable source, or it should be removed.
Spotchecks:
This is the one we'll need to look at more closely. While a GA isn't required to be comprehensive, shorter articles are generally expected to either be expanded or to already cover everything in the sources. To start, I suggest really mining the sources that are in the article to get everything you can out of them.
A few ideas for things to look for:
I looked through a few sources, and these are the ones I found that seem to have useful info:
No ideas are given undue weight, and the article does not present its own opinions.
No disputes.
The picture is relevant and it has a non-free use rationale. If possible, it might be worth rewording the caption so it conveys the same idea without being so wordy.