This page is not a forum for general discussion about Morse code. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Morse code at the Reference desk. |
Morse code was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
Hello, I think there is one little mistake in this (apart from that in my opinion fantastic, clearly arranged and very helpful) Morse code tree, isn't it? '-.--.' leads to 'Ĥ' and '-.--.-' leads to '(' and ')'. But I think '-.--.' means '(' and '-.--.-' means ')'. At https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Morse_code I found '----' media:CH, Ĥ, Š Morse Code.oga. What do you think? But I don't know how to change it. Thanks in advance for your help. Yours, -- 2A02:810B:8C3F:EA08:70A3:2ED0:4E9B:732F ( talk) 23:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Sourcing for non-latin extensions seems weak, and there is no apparent standard as I understand. In the table of codes we list numerous codes that are not part of the International Morris Code standard, some with the footnote "The character or symbol encoding is not in either ITU-R M.1172 or ITU-R M.1677-1 .", and none referenced. The result is a large table that is confusing and unverifiable.
I propose separating the codes actually in the standard from the rest, and those all need some reference or be removed; there is no way to tell if they are incorrect, as demonstrated by the issue @ Pengo points out with the characters ż ⇄ ź Strangerpete ( talk) 12:57, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
the line for "K" in the table is malformatted, and needs to be fixed 2603:6080:4E00:AA8:5126:E872:C9AD:C77B ( talk) 18:04, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
These are (mostly) not "non-Latin", they are perfectly normal latin characters not used in English. Is this really what they are called in the wider world? Bagunceiro ( talk) 17:27, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Suggest to change ‘a through z’ to ‘a to z’. Using ‘through’ this way is not standard/traditional English (this usage is only found in recent American texts and is not widely understood or accepted outside the US). In standard English, using ’through’ in this sense is unnecessary and wrong because the original ‘to’ performs exactly the same function. 2001:E68:5404:44CB:88FD:BCB7:5713:6B54 ( talk) 16:21, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to request a change of the word "identifcation" to "identification" in both occurrences in the "Aviation" section. Both Wiktionary and web searches suggest that the former is a misspelling, not some technical term that could be mistaken for a misspelling, like "ordnance". 166.181.80.186 ( talk) 03:09, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Morse code. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Morse code at the Reference desk. |
Morse code was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
Hello, I think there is one little mistake in this (apart from that in my opinion fantastic, clearly arranged and very helpful) Morse code tree, isn't it? '-.--.' leads to 'Ĥ' and '-.--.-' leads to '(' and ')'. But I think '-.--.' means '(' and '-.--.-' means ')'. At https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Morse_code I found '----' media:CH, Ĥ, Š Morse Code.oga. What do you think? But I don't know how to change it. Thanks in advance for your help. Yours, -- 2A02:810B:8C3F:EA08:70A3:2ED0:4E9B:732F ( talk) 23:25, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Sourcing for non-latin extensions seems weak, and there is no apparent standard as I understand. In the table of codes we list numerous codes that are not part of the International Morris Code standard, some with the footnote "The character or symbol encoding is not in either ITU-R M.1172 or ITU-R M.1677-1 .", and none referenced. The result is a large table that is confusing and unverifiable.
I propose separating the codes actually in the standard from the rest, and those all need some reference or be removed; there is no way to tell if they are incorrect, as demonstrated by the issue @ Pengo points out with the characters ż ⇄ ź Strangerpete ( talk) 12:57, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
the line for "K" in the table is malformatted, and needs to be fixed 2603:6080:4E00:AA8:5126:E872:C9AD:C77B ( talk) 18:04, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
These are (mostly) not "non-Latin", they are perfectly normal latin characters not used in English. Is this really what they are called in the wider world? Bagunceiro ( talk) 17:27, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Suggest to change ‘a through z’ to ‘a to z’. Using ‘through’ this way is not standard/traditional English (this usage is only found in recent American texts and is not widely understood or accepted outside the US). In standard English, using ’through’ in this sense is unnecessary and wrong because the original ‘to’ performs exactly the same function. 2001:E68:5404:44CB:88FD:BCB7:5713:6B54 ( talk) 16:21, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to request a change of the word "identifcation" to "identification" in both occurrences in the "Aviation" section. Both Wiktionary and web searches suggest that the former is a misspelling, not some technical term that could be mistaken for a misspelling, like "ordnance". 166.181.80.186 ( talk) 03:09, 2 October 2023 (UTC)