This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The link to class in this article is ambiguous, however the class (disambiguation) page do not have a suitable substitute. We will either need to create a new item on the disambiguation page or de-link this page. -- Wolfling 12:08, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
How did this term originate, mono means one, and graph could implie a statistical analysis of a certain subject. So mono-graph would seem to become an analysis of a single subject over a period of time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danleech ( talk • contribs) 21:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Would Annual publication and yearbooks be considered a monograph? John Vandenberg 00:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
No. Must be on a single subject, often a person, and also normally by a single author. Johnbod 21:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Please note that the barcode on this page is not a valid ISBN-13 barcode. All 13-digit ISBNs current start with 978, although the 979 prefix is likely to be introduced next year. 970 is not a "Bookland" prefix.
Brian Green International ISBN Agency — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.139.34 ( talk) 19:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
If you mention a monograph in writing, should the title be underlined, italicized, or put in quotation marks? Frenchie16 ( talk) 15:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
To me it is formal and concise, usually compendial. See the below....
-- 222.64.219.102 ( talk) 07:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Longman Contemporary English-Chinese Dictionary: An article or short book on one particular subject or branch of a subject (scientific, medical, etc.) that the writer has studied deeply —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.64.219.102 ( talk) 08:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
From online dictionaries
-- 222.64.219.102 ( talk) 08:28, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.219.102 ( talk) 08:33, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.219.102 ( talk) 08:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
It's a very muddled and vague description. The quality of the explanation needs work.
24.9.117.18 ( talk) 01:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
The Library Of Congress defines "multipart monographs" as something that can consist of CDs or audiocassettes: "multipart monograph - A type of monographic resource issued in two or more parts (either simultaneously or successively) that is complete or intended to be completed within a finite number of parts (e.g., a dictionary in two volumes or three audiocassettes issued as a set). " http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-outlineChanges-3-4.html ( PascalC ( talk) 14:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC))
The article says—via a citation to a link I can't access—that a monograph is a comprehensive account of a 'subject'. My reading of the term is that the work is about a subject [genus]. without intending to be comprehensive. A comparison might be a 'Flora', which purports to embrace the entire botanical subject (within regional, systematic, or other constraint). Is this a potential improvement or something I don't know? — cygnis insignis 16:13, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The link to class in this article is ambiguous, however the class (disambiguation) page do not have a suitable substitute. We will either need to create a new item on the disambiguation page or de-link this page. -- Wolfling 12:08, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
How did this term originate, mono means one, and graph could implie a statistical analysis of a certain subject. So mono-graph would seem to become an analysis of a single subject over a period of time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danleech ( talk • contribs) 21:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Would Annual publication and yearbooks be considered a monograph? John Vandenberg 00:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
No. Must be on a single subject, often a person, and also normally by a single author. Johnbod 21:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Please note that the barcode on this page is not a valid ISBN-13 barcode. All 13-digit ISBNs current start with 978, although the 979 prefix is likely to be introduced next year. 970 is not a "Bookland" prefix.
Brian Green International ISBN Agency — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.139.34 ( talk) 19:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
If you mention a monograph in writing, should the title be underlined, italicized, or put in quotation marks? Frenchie16 ( talk) 15:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
To me it is formal and concise, usually compendial. See the below....
-- 222.64.219.102 ( talk) 07:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Longman Contemporary English-Chinese Dictionary: An article or short book on one particular subject or branch of a subject (scientific, medical, etc.) that the writer has studied deeply —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.64.219.102 ( talk) 08:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
From online dictionaries
-- 222.64.219.102 ( talk) 08:28, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.219.102 ( talk) 08:33, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
-- 222.64.219.102 ( talk) 08:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
It's a very muddled and vague description. The quality of the explanation needs work.
24.9.117.18 ( talk) 01:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
The Library Of Congress defines "multipart monographs" as something that can consist of CDs or audiocassettes: "multipart monograph - A type of monographic resource issued in two or more parts (either simultaneously or successively) that is complete or intended to be completed within a finite number of parts (e.g., a dictionary in two volumes or three audiocassettes issued as a set). " http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/mods-outlineChanges-3-4.html ( PascalC ( talk) 14:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC))
The article says—via a citation to a link I can't access—that a monograph is a comprehensive account of a 'subject'. My reading of the term is that the work is about a subject [genus]. without intending to be comprehensive. A comparison might be a 'Flora', which purports to embrace the entire botanical subject (within regional, systematic, or other constraint). Is this a potential improvement or something I don't know? — cygnis insignis 16:13, 8 August 2018 (UTC)