This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Misogyny article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Misogyny was copied or moved into Scientology and gender with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
Category | The following sources contain public domain or freely licensed material that may be incorporated into this article:
|
It is shameful that misogyny has been doctored to fit into the current agenda based environment that seeks to change the meaning of all things to serve the liberal ideological scamp. How did LGTB get added to the definition when in essence it has nothing to do with the term and is only inclusive as a means to serving an agenda. Sad people. Sad. 174.232.152.3 ( talk) 17:55, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Delete this line: Misandry is a minor issue, not equivalent to the widespread practice and extensive history of misogyny
Reason: Misandry is a widely practiced prejudice today, easily as prevalent as Misogyny. White men have become the bane, the object of scorn all across today's socialized world. It's happened in a few short years, but now is widely practiced and advertised. This article reinforces all the old stereotypes, and hasn't been updated to include the new hate-white-men phenomenon, blaming them for all the wrongs of society. This article is inherently racist and misandristic, and is further proof of the hate-white-men syndrome which plagues today's media and this wikipedia article. Gloria77g ( talk) 03:04, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
This aptly links to the idea of diwalisexual, the sexual attraction solely towards people of the hindu religion, most popular amongst men. There have been attacks on people expressing their diwalisexual selves.
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the feminist thought section about rejecting qualities in men that are unmanly and 'womanly hobbies'. This is not correct for this theory as it is about equality and will cause damage to the concept of feminism from men's opinions. Unnece ( talk) 16:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
{{
Edit semi-protected}}
template. Additionally, please provide reliable sources to support this proposed change, should consensus be reached. --
Pinchme123 (
talk) 03:38, 12 September 2023 (UTC)This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hannahsooter ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: Katewun.
— Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz ( talk) 16:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Great and very important entry, thanks to all those who have worked so hard.
One query: the first two named quotations that define the term 'misogyny' are by male academics eg Allan G Johnson and Michael Flood. In the following section there are two women cited on the subject and one man. This means the dominant citations by name in the first paras are three men and two women.
Perhaps the first two citations could be women not men? eg I would suggest Catharine MacKinnon whose book Are Women Human is replete with definitions. And any other number of key feminist scholars. there's a very good article from 2017 by Kalpana Srivastava, Suprakash Chaudury, P.S. Bhat and Samiksha Sahu which also expands the discussion to a less western-centric view as well.
Nothing - whatsoever - against Allan G Johnson and Michael Flood who are clearly part of the solution not the problem and doing great academic work.
Many thanks.
MiloQuest (
talk) 07:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
The lead says It is a form of sexism that is used to keep women at a lower social status than men
. This looks all good, but I'm unsure about the "used to" part. It is to my understanding that a lot of misogyny is subconscious (eg
internalised sexism), rather than done on purpose ("used to"). With this in mind, should we remove the "used to" part?
So that sentence would look something like It is a form of sexism that keeps women at a lower social status than men
—
Panamitsu
(talk) 06:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Misogyny article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Misogyny was copied or moved into Scientology and gender with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
This article has been
mentioned by a media organization:
|
Category | The following sources contain public domain or freely licensed material that may be incorporated into this article:
|
It is shameful that misogyny has been doctored to fit into the current agenda based environment that seeks to change the meaning of all things to serve the liberal ideological scamp. How did LGTB get added to the definition when in essence it has nothing to do with the term and is only inclusive as a means to serving an agenda. Sad people. Sad. 174.232.152.3 ( talk) 17:55, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Delete this line: Misandry is a minor issue, not equivalent to the widespread practice and extensive history of misogyny
Reason: Misandry is a widely practiced prejudice today, easily as prevalent as Misogyny. White men have become the bane, the object of scorn all across today's socialized world. It's happened in a few short years, but now is widely practiced and advertised. This article reinforces all the old stereotypes, and hasn't been updated to include the new hate-white-men phenomenon, blaming them for all the wrongs of society. This article is inherently racist and misandristic, and is further proof of the hate-white-men syndrome which plagues today's media and this wikipedia article. Gloria77g ( talk) 03:04, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
This aptly links to the idea of diwalisexual, the sexual attraction solely towards people of the hindu religion, most popular amongst men. There have been attacks on people expressing their diwalisexual selves.
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the feminist thought section about rejecting qualities in men that are unmanly and 'womanly hobbies'. This is not correct for this theory as it is about equality and will cause damage to the concept of feminism from men's opinions. Unnece ( talk) 16:12, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
{{
Edit semi-protected}}
template. Additionally, please provide reliable sources to support this proposed change, should consensus be reached. --
Pinchme123 (
talk) 03:38, 12 September 2023 (UTC)This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hannahsooter ( article contribs). Peer reviewers: Katewun.
— Assignment last updated by ACHorwitz ( talk) 16:18, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Great and very important entry, thanks to all those who have worked so hard.
One query: the first two named quotations that define the term 'misogyny' are by male academics eg Allan G Johnson and Michael Flood. In the following section there are two women cited on the subject and one man. This means the dominant citations by name in the first paras are three men and two women.
Perhaps the first two citations could be women not men? eg I would suggest Catharine MacKinnon whose book Are Women Human is replete with definitions. And any other number of key feminist scholars. there's a very good article from 2017 by Kalpana Srivastava, Suprakash Chaudury, P.S. Bhat and Samiksha Sahu which also expands the discussion to a less western-centric view as well.
Nothing - whatsoever - against Allan G Johnson and Michael Flood who are clearly part of the solution not the problem and doing great academic work.
Many thanks.
MiloQuest (
talk) 07:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
The lead says It is a form of sexism that is used to keep women at a lower social status than men
. This looks all good, but I'm unsure about the "used to" part. It is to my understanding that a lot of misogyny is subconscious (eg
internalised sexism), rather than done on purpose ("used to"). With this in mind, should we remove the "used to" part?
So that sentence would look something like It is a form of sexism that keeps women at a lower social status than men
—
Panamitsu
(talk) 06:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)