This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. U.S. Supreme Court cases Start‑class Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

is that actually a case or did someone just edit that incorrectly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.103.142.208 ( talk) 01:00, 30 March 2016 (UTC) shouldn't it just be jackson v. state of arkansas? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.103.142.208 ( talk) 01:01, 30 March 2016 (UTC) reply

It was vandalism. It should have read Jackson v. Hobbs. Hobbs was the Director of the Department of Corrections, so somebody was trying to be inflammatory. 136.174.187.5 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Evan was given a resentencing hearing in 2017, however it was not until April 2021 a verdict had been reached with Evan being resentenced to life without parole. ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]} Miller is now trying to appeal his resentencing verdict. ^{[12] [13] [14]}

Evan is currently imprisoned in the St. Clair Correctional Facility. ^{[15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21]} and Colby Smith is imprisoned in the Staton Correctional Facility. ^[22]-- Dylan Harris Golden ( talk) 02:03, 30 November 2020 (UTC) reply

EDITORS: User Dylan Harris Golden is a confirmed sockpuppet of Cadeken ( talk · contribs), and the IP is very likely a sockpuppet Cadeken, a prolific sock master who has edited this page and similar pages with numerous sockpuppets. Cadeken's IP socks, such as this one, are almost always located in or near Tulare, CA, USA. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Cadeken/Archive. Sundayclose ( talk) 00:51, 15 November 2021 (UTC) reply

There is nothing about Jones v. Mississippi in this article. Thats weird. 67.170.255.241 ( talk) 07:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC) reply