This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Norway This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles Socialism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm a bit concerned about the "Release" section and whether it could be said to conform to out guidelines on neutral point of view ( WP:NPOV). This section seems to me to be glued together by original synthesis somehow, although I'm not certain that can actually be held against it. Shouldn't we have some encompassing reliable source making these points and explicitly saying that Hippe was unfairly treated by Dagsrevyen? If this had been judged to be a breach of the Ethical Code of Practice for the Norwegian Press by Pressens Faglige Utvalg (PFU) then I would be much more comfortable with this section than I am right now. __ meco ( talk) 11:10, 12 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mektig og avmektig. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629133325/http://www.aftenposten.no/kul_und/article485575.ece to http://www.aftenposten.no/kul_und/article485575.ece

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC) reply