From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Nominator: TonyTheTiger ( talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Sawyer-mcdonell ( talk · contribs) 23:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply


Unfortunately I'm going to quickfail this. The sourcing is the single biggest issue, especially the fact that the article cites a forum post from 2010 three times, as well as IMDb and Broadwayworld.com, which are very much unreliable - this alone is enough for a quickfail, in my opinion. I'm also not convinced of the reliability of any of these sites [1] [2] [3] [4], to say the least. All of the mentioned sources should be removed and replaced with actual reliable sources. Not to mention the multiple dead links, poor writing, and superfluous information. This should've been fixed before the nomination. sawyer * he/they * talk 00:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Nominator: TonyTheTiger ( talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Sawyer-mcdonell ( talk · contribs) 23:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC) reply


Unfortunately I'm going to quickfail this. The sourcing is the single biggest issue, especially the fact that the article cites a forum post from 2010 three times, as well as IMDb and Broadwayworld.com, which are very much unreliable - this alone is enough for a quickfail, in my opinion. I'm also not convinced of the reliability of any of these sites [1] [2] [3] [4], to say the least. All of the mentioned sources should be removed and replaced with actual reliable sources. Not to mention the multiple dead links, poor writing, and superfluous information. This should've been fixed before the nomination. sawyer * he/they * talk 00:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC) reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook