This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
His excellent use of light and dark in black and white movies is simply beautiful - POV? Cnwb 05:07, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
The link to Black Sunday is not Bava's version of the film by the same title. It is for Frankenheimer's.
"Diabolik (1968) was one of the world's first comic book adaptations". Even if you ignore comic strip to cartoon adaptations, such as Krazy Kat, Superman jumped from comic books to film 20 years before Diabolik.
Surely I Vampiri is the first acknowledged co-directed film (1956). Collaboration with Riccardo Freda is not mentioned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffcb25 ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Image:Mario bava.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
So, here it is. The tag was back in April. Actually, everything in the article IS accurate. However, it is a very quick overview verging on stub - even with the filmography or ins spite of it. A lot of detail about his cinematic skills is sorely missing, for example. 104.169.41.8 ( talk) 23:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Despite two sources stating that Bava had directed the film (one (from the early 2000s) going as far as to say Bava directed 90% of the film. The article itself in question finds that Alex Cox writes in his book (from 2010) that Bava isn't the main director. Tim Lucas who wrote in his 2007 book that Bava couldn't have been the assistant director, but also that his son Lamberto notes that Bava was there to do matte work, but also took over to do some directorial work, but it's not clear how much he did. Now, if it was 100% clear that the film was mostly directed by Bava, I'd say go for it, but as it stands from the sources on hand, the more contemporary ones don't go into full detail how much he did and it was truly 90%, i feel like that would have been set clear from a) people who were on set and b) the other more contemporary sources. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 07:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
His excellent use of light and dark in black and white movies is simply beautiful - POV? Cnwb 05:07, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
The link to Black Sunday is not Bava's version of the film by the same title. It is for Frankenheimer's.
"Diabolik (1968) was one of the world's first comic book adaptations". Even if you ignore comic strip to cartoon adaptations, such as Krazy Kat, Superman jumped from comic books to film 20 years before Diabolik.
Surely I Vampiri is the first acknowledged co-directed film (1956). Collaboration with Riccardo Freda is not mentioned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffcb25 ( talk • contribs) 20:29, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Image:Mario bava.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
So, here it is. The tag was back in April. Actually, everything in the article IS accurate. However, it is a very quick overview verging on stub - even with the filmography or ins spite of it. A lot of detail about his cinematic skills is sorely missing, for example. 104.169.41.8 ( talk) 23:43, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Despite two sources stating that Bava had directed the film (one (from the early 2000s) going as far as to say Bava directed 90% of the film. The article itself in question finds that Alex Cox writes in his book (from 2010) that Bava isn't the main director. Tim Lucas who wrote in his 2007 book that Bava couldn't have been the assistant director, but also that his son Lamberto notes that Bava was there to do matte work, but also took over to do some directorial work, but it's not clear how much he did. Now, if it was 100% clear that the film was mostly directed by Bava, I'd say go for it, but as it stands from the sources on hand, the more contemporary ones don't go into full detail how much he did and it was truly 90%, i feel like that would have been set clear from a) people who were on set and b) the other more contemporary sources. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 07:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)