This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in South Dakota may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
An entire town gets destroyed by a tornado, and this is as much of the story as we get? - Jlhamilt 19:28, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
These mugs could've died. Don't nobody care though. Ain't that a damn shame.
If you're basing your assumptions based on the population it's quite deceving, since someone put the population of the entire township in that box. I have seen this on many unincorporated communities pages, it makes people think there's alot more people in the town than what it says.. Manchester only had a handfull of people living there, so it's basically an unincorporated community like it says in the beginning of the page, thankfully no one was killed in this tornado outbreak. -- Atilla5 ( talk) 03:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
The EF-scale was introduced in 2007, but the tornado occured in 2003. I think it is quite senseless to mention the possible EF-scale rating, because the scientific accepted damage rating scale back in 2003 was the original Fujita-Scale. If one mentiones the EF-rating, one should do it correct. The tornadic circulation reached a speed of over 260 mph and according to this data the tornado was an EF5 and not an EF4.
I've removed the additional EF-rating from the article. If this shouldn't be correct (e.g. in case of the speed was downgraded) one may revoke my changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.131.200.106 ( talk) 12:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Manchester, South Dakota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in South Dakota may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
An entire town gets destroyed by a tornado, and this is as much of the story as we get? - Jlhamilt 19:28, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
These mugs could've died. Don't nobody care though. Ain't that a damn shame.
If you're basing your assumptions based on the population it's quite deceving, since someone put the population of the entire township in that box. I have seen this on many unincorporated communities pages, it makes people think there's alot more people in the town than what it says.. Manchester only had a handfull of people living there, so it's basically an unincorporated community like it says in the beginning of the page, thankfully no one was killed in this tornado outbreak. -- Atilla5 ( talk) 03:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
The EF-scale was introduced in 2007, but the tornado occured in 2003. I think it is quite senseless to mention the possible EF-scale rating, because the scientific accepted damage rating scale back in 2003 was the original Fujita-Scale. If one mentiones the EF-rating, one should do it correct. The tornadic circulation reached a speed of over 260 mph and according to this data the tornado was an EF5 and not an EF4.
I've removed the additional EF-rating from the article. If this shouldn't be correct (e.g. in case of the speed was downgraded) one may revoke my changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.131.200.106 ( talk) 12:35, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Manchester, South Dakota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:44, 15 January 2018 (UTC)