The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Godotalgorithm ( talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Chemistry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A new page MOPAC (file format) is needed, which should cross link to Chemical file format and use also the proper [[Category:Chemical file format]] category. JKW 16:02, 8 April 2006 (UTC) reply

why? Karol 21:52, 8 April 2006 (UTC) reply

There is plenty of room in the MOPAC article and that is where file format information should go. -- Bduke 02:30, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MOPAC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091126133822/http://winmostar.com/index_en.html to http://winmostar.com/index_en.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC) reply

A new editor with an actual or apparent conflict of interest has requested assistance with making an addition to this article. The requested edits backlog is high. Please be very patient. There are currently 168 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

I'll refrain from editing the main body of the MOPAC entry for COI reasons, but it isn't very well written, it contains highly out-of-date information, and it completely lacks any scientific references. At the suggestion of a mentoring editor, I've revised the MOPAC entry in my Sandbox, and I'd like it to be considered as a replacement/revision of the current MOPAC entry.

Godotalgorithm ( talk) 05:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

 Note: Link - User:Godotalgorithm/sandbox Encoded Talk to me! 15:45, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The draft in your Sandbox looks good to me, written in NPOV. I think you can publish and if you note the COI that should be fine - or would you prefer a re-write by someone like me who doesn't have a COI? Note I probably couldn't get to it until May. Nnev66 ( talk) 14:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I didn't see this message directly, but I got a notification about your post on my talk page. I'm fine with publishing my version, I just want it to occur with the appropriate amount of "un-conflicted" oversight, in accordance with Wikipedia policy. It is getting close to the top of the COI resolution queue, so this will probably reach the attention of someone who is more experienced with this, soon enough. Perhaps your opinion and vote of confidence will help expedite the process a bit.

Also, as a matter of disclosure and clarification, I'm less concerned about NPOV issues than primary/secondary source issues. I'm generally interested in the history of MOPAC, in addition to its continued development, and I've been collecting historical information about it to build a more complete history of it. I appreciate that Wikipedia is not a place for primary information and has a preference for citing high-quality secondary information over primary information, and so I've been as care as I can in collecting and citing information, but some of what I'm citing is inevitably primary information that I have collected and disseminated elsewhere (e.g. the historical MOPAC source code archive on GitHub). I do plan to improve MOPAC's web footprint by making more of its history web-accessible, but that primary information will go elsewhere (e.g. MOPAC's primary website) and perhaps some of it will be noted in updates to the Wikipedia entry in the future. I personally do not plan to make any more updates to this Wikipedia entry except for keeping the version info up-to-date in the software infobox. Godotalgorithm ( talk) 16:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

That's a good point about secondary sources. Your version includes them and makes it a stronger article. I hadn't realized you could see the wait time in the COI resolution queue. I'm happy to support your improvements to the page as a non-COI computational chemist. Also, I don't think you were notified about my comment because I didn't sign my name with four tilde's (~'s). I found this out by asking a question at the Wikipedia:Teahouse. When I add your name User:Godotalgorithm and sign as mentioned you should get notified. Nnev66 ( talk) 20:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply