This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Alternative education, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Alternative educationWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative educationTemplate:WikiProject Alternative educationAlternative education articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the
importance scale.
Title
I know this is nit-picky, but this should be titled "List of works on waldorf education not written by Rudolf Steiner" OR it should include his works. Yes/ No?
The two lists could indeed be merged...at the moment, the introductory sentence with a link to the Steiner list clarifies the situation, so it could also stay as is...I'd avoid an excessively long title, in any case. Wafflingly,
Hgilbert 12:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Alternative education, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Alternative educationWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative educationTemplate:WikiProject Alternative educationAlternative education articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the
importance scale.
Title
I know this is nit-picky, but this should be titled "List of works on waldorf education not written by Rudolf Steiner" OR it should include his works. Yes/ No?
The two lists could indeed be merged...at the moment, the introductory sentence with a link to the Steiner list clarifies the situation, so it could also stay as is...I'd avoid an excessively long title, in any case. Wafflingly,
Hgilbert 12:51, 11 August 2007 (UTC)reply
