This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of rifle cartridges article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 360 days |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have a 35 cal. Marlin Rifle. I was hoping to see if the Welling round would work with it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew9669 ( talk • contribs) 17:36, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I propose merging the common centerfire and uncommon, obscure, proprietary sections into a single "Centerfire" section. Currently there are no defined criteria for inclusion in either list and there are a large number of obscure and/or uncommon cartidges in the former. Cavalryman V31 ( talk) 01:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC).
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I propose we remove all redlinks and un-linked cartridges. If the cartridge has an independent page it can be presumed to be WP:Verifable. Cavalryman V31 ( talk) 01:14, 13 October 2018 (UTC).
Hello FuuMasta ( talk · contribs), can I request that you read WP:REDLINKS? It states redlinks are “for subjects that should have articles but do not”, in other words subjects that meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. WP:GNG states a topic is notable if it “has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article...”
Of the redlinks you keep reintroducing, I can only find reliable sources independent of the subject for the .458 HAM'R. Please either create these articles or present multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject here for each of these cartridges. Otherwise they will be removed again. Cavalryman ( talk) 09:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC).
Hello Cavalryman ( talk · contribs), In the event that you undo my edit again, just be carefull to not undo the fix in the sorting of the cartridges. Furthermore, I have in introduced .375 SOCOM, wich already have a perfect Article but wasn't included in the list. Other cartridges like .375 Raptor now have an article that will be improved over the next days and weeks and the .460 Steyr have a huge follow up in some countries and documentation is available in other language.
Also, I have no doutbt that it will that very little time make with the good editors to gather the documentation for the remaining cartridges and I have an idea to include them elsewhere if ever i'm wrong about that.
FuuMasta ( talk) 14:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Cavalryman ( talk · contribs), I will not create that list in that case. Also, I would really appreciate if WP:WIP and WP:PERFECTION policies could be concepts applied on my Articles like .375 Raptor, .460 Steyr and future one. You rebuke me because i've use blogs article, yet this exact reference is fine ont the German Wikipedia. Even the very short .458 HAM'R stub that you created contain that kind of sourcing. I would appreciate that you help me improving them instead of killing my attempt to make a good article. FuuMasta ( talk) 03:05, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of rifle cartridges article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 360 days |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have a 35 cal. Marlin Rifle. I was hoping to see if the Welling round would work with it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthew9669 ( talk • contribs) 17:36, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I propose merging the common centerfire and uncommon, obscure, proprietary sections into a single "Centerfire" section. Currently there are no defined criteria for inclusion in either list and there are a large number of obscure and/or uncommon cartidges in the former. Cavalryman V31 ( talk) 01:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC).
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I propose we remove all redlinks and un-linked cartridges. If the cartridge has an independent page it can be presumed to be WP:Verifable. Cavalryman V31 ( talk) 01:14, 13 October 2018 (UTC).
Hello FuuMasta ( talk · contribs), can I request that you read WP:REDLINKS? It states redlinks are “for subjects that should have articles but do not”, in other words subjects that meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. WP:GNG states a topic is notable if it “has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article...”
Of the redlinks you keep reintroducing, I can only find reliable sources independent of the subject for the .458 HAM'R. Please either create these articles or present multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject here for each of these cartridges. Otherwise they will be removed again. Cavalryman ( talk) 09:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC).
Hello Cavalryman ( talk · contribs), In the event that you undo my edit again, just be carefull to not undo the fix in the sorting of the cartridges. Furthermore, I have in introduced .375 SOCOM, wich already have a perfect Article but wasn't included in the list. Other cartridges like .375 Raptor now have an article that will be improved over the next days and weeks and the .460 Steyr have a huge follow up in some countries and documentation is available in other language.
Also, I have no doutbt that it will that very little time make with the good editors to gather the documentation for the remaining cartridges and I have an idea to include them elsewhere if ever i'm wrong about that.
FuuMasta ( talk) 14:47, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Cavalryman ( talk · contribs), I will not create that list in that case. Also, I would really appreciate if WP:WIP and WP:PERFECTION policies could be concepts applied on my Articles like .375 Raptor, .460 Steyr and future one. You rebuke me because i've use blogs article, yet this exact reference is fine ont the German Wikipedia. Even the very short .458 HAM'R stub that you created contain that kind of sourcing. I would appreciate that you help me improving them instead of killing my attempt to make a good article. FuuMasta ( talk) 03:05, 14 September 2020 (UTC)