From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List

This is not the full list, right? The reference shows 100+ landmarks. I was trying to figure out which landmarks were being added to this page, but I can't find a pattern. At first I thought it was only imaged places.. then maybe bluelinks.. but neither of these applies to every item on the list. Whatever the reason for not including all the landmarks is, I think they should actually all be included, even with no images or landmarks. I'd be willing to help list out all of the landmarks if desired (I just finished National Monument (Ireland) in much the same way). What do you say? -- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 17:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC) reply

I didn't have time to add them all, but I was adding ones that I knew of and ones that were NRHP or NHL (in reality, no rhyme or reason to it). By all means add a few more to the list! poroubalous ( talk) 02:50, 4 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Apotheosis-of-saint-louis.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Apotheosis-of-saint-louis.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 24 April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Apotheosis-of-saint-louis.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 03:32, 27 April 2012 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of landmarks of St. Louis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:51, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List

This is not the full list, right? The reference shows 100+ landmarks. I was trying to figure out which landmarks were being added to this page, but I can't find a pattern. At first I thought it was only imaged places.. then maybe bluelinks.. but neither of these applies to every item on the list. Whatever the reason for not including all the landmarks is, I think they should actually all be included, even with no images or landmarks. I'd be willing to help list out all of the landmarks if desired (I just finished National Monument (Ireland) in much the same way). What do you say? -- Dudemanfellabra ( talk) 17:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC) reply

I didn't have time to add them all, but I was adding ones that I knew of and ones that were NRHP or NHL (in reality, no rhyme or reason to it). By all means add a few more to the list! poroubalous ( talk) 02:50, 4 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Apotheosis-of-saint-louis.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Apotheosis-of-saint-louis.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 24 April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Apotheosis-of-saint-louis.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 03:32, 27 April 2012 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of landmarks of St. Louis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:51, 31 December 2017 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook