This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
If there is, please inform me. Paintspot ( talk) 17:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Shouldn't the Japanese names for each Pokemon be included in this list? Lord Seth ( talk) 20:45, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Seeing how several articles give the IPA pronunciations for Pokémon names, I think we should do something similar here. The way I see it, we would implement them using Template:Abbr, just like the article already does for kanji and rōmaji. For example, Caterpie would give /ˈkætərpiː/. And as it happens, I have made such pronunciation keys for every Pokémon except for Generation VII, which I hoped to implement before the page received a complete overhaul to its current format. The downside to this is that this is already a breach of use for this particular markup, better detailed on the template page. Still, I think it'd be a useful addition, assuming the page isn't big enough as it is. User:SubZeroSilver ( talk) 21:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on List of generation I Pokémon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on List of generation I Pokémon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Should the Mega Evolutions not be in a tableb of their own, like the Alolan Forms? After all, the table clearly states that these Pokémon were introduced in Generation I, 1996, though Mega Evolutions have only been around since 2013. Wtrmln124 ( talk) 10:19, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
I think Porygon and its evolutions should get their own page too. They have a lot to talk about and I'll help too but I don't know how to code so I'll need help. Can someone help me? Porygon-Z ( talk) 17:26, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Shouldn't we put Categories for Pokemon as well. If we have the Japanese name surely we can put the categories in as well, right? Porygon-Z ( talk) 19:48, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
According to Bulbapedia, in Pokémon: Let's Go, Pikachu! and Let's Go, Eevee!, the Kanto regional Pokédex was expanded to include Meltan and Melmetal (#152 and #153 Kanto; #808 and #809 national). Should we add them to this page? Pianostar9 ( talk) 20:49, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Should we include the Pokemon's category (Like Pikachu as the Mouse Pokemon)? That would be quite accurate and plus people are curious, don't you think? Porygon-Z ( talk) 18:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Genwunners are people that like only the first generation of Pokemon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.239.240.43 ( talk) 06:09, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
We can list each glitch pokémon in a different section, as there is other notable glitch pokémon, like Charizard 'M/Q, and 44HY. 74.193.157.120 ( talk) 20:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Fairy was only introduced in pokemon X&Y, where may pokemon like clarfairy got changed from normal to fairy. As a note in my opinion is kinda not conveys the info in the best way, so should make a fairy/normal colour or do we remove it? The Dino-Pi ( talk) 09:11, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Is not apart of this list 95.151.255.109 ( talk) 13:06, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
I think generation should be uncapitalized throughout these articles, as it's not a proper noun and it would be more consistent with the titles of the articles. Landfish7 ( talk) 05:36, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Do you think that an article about Ivysaur, Bulbasaur's evolved form, should be created here? RMXY ( talk) 12:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Looking through the reliable source search engine, I can tell you that Ivysaur is not notable. There are just no good sources. QuicoleJR ( talk) 23:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article fails to satisfy the criteria for WP:GNG, and doesn't have standalone notability. The sources are all trivial coverage. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 06:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
In the first few hours of the gameplay tests in the United States, Australia and New Zealand, Venusaur was the last Pokémon available to be captured, and the rest is basically just a list of media that Venusaur appears in, which, given the nature of Pokémon, is a lot, and, given the nature of Pokémon articles, lacks proper sources. § Reception just feels like listicles, and very important and nuanced criticism like
Steven Hansen felt that Venusaur's Mega Evolution looked "stupid.". I'm not necessarily opposed to merging the article with Bulbasaur rather than List of generation I Pokémon, though. DecafPotato ( talk) 09:21, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
If there is, please inform me. Paintspot ( talk) 17:50, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Shouldn't the Japanese names for each Pokemon be included in this list? Lord Seth ( talk) 20:45, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Seeing how several articles give the IPA pronunciations for Pokémon names, I think we should do something similar here. The way I see it, we would implement them using Template:Abbr, just like the article already does for kanji and rōmaji. For example, Caterpie would give /ˈkætərpiː/. And as it happens, I have made such pronunciation keys for every Pokémon except for Generation VII, which I hoped to implement before the page received a complete overhaul to its current format. The downside to this is that this is already a breach of use for this particular markup, better detailed on the template page. Still, I think it'd be a useful addition, assuming the page isn't big enough as it is. User:SubZeroSilver ( talk) 21:31, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on List of generation I Pokémon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on List of generation I Pokémon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:50, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Should the Mega Evolutions not be in a tableb of their own, like the Alolan Forms? After all, the table clearly states that these Pokémon were introduced in Generation I, 1996, though Mega Evolutions have only been around since 2013. Wtrmln124 ( talk) 10:19, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
I think Porygon and its evolutions should get their own page too. They have a lot to talk about and I'll help too but I don't know how to code so I'll need help. Can someone help me? Porygon-Z ( talk) 17:26, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Shouldn't we put Categories for Pokemon as well. If we have the Japanese name surely we can put the categories in as well, right? Porygon-Z ( talk) 19:48, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
According to Bulbapedia, in Pokémon: Let's Go, Pikachu! and Let's Go, Eevee!, the Kanto regional Pokédex was expanded to include Meltan and Melmetal (#152 and #153 Kanto; #808 and #809 national). Should we add them to this page? Pianostar9 ( talk) 20:49, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Should we include the Pokemon's category (Like Pikachu as the Mouse Pokemon)? That would be quite accurate and plus people are curious, don't you think? Porygon-Z ( talk) 18:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Genwunners are people that like only the first generation of Pokemon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.239.240.43 ( talk) 06:09, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
We can list each glitch pokémon in a different section, as there is other notable glitch pokémon, like Charizard 'M/Q, and 44HY. 74.193.157.120 ( talk) 20:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Fairy was only introduced in pokemon X&Y, where may pokemon like clarfairy got changed from normal to fairy. As a note in my opinion is kinda not conveys the info in the best way, so should make a fairy/normal colour or do we remove it? The Dino-Pi ( talk) 09:11, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Is not apart of this list 95.151.255.109 ( talk) 13:06, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
I think generation should be uncapitalized throughout these articles, as it's not a proper noun and it would be more consistent with the titles of the articles. Landfish7 ( talk) 05:36, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Do you think that an article about Ivysaur, Bulbasaur's evolved form, should be created here? RMXY ( talk) 12:33, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Looking through the reliable source search engine, I can tell you that Ivysaur is not notable. There are just no good sources. QuicoleJR ( talk) 23:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article fails to satisfy the criteria for WP:GNG, and doesn't have standalone notability. The sources are all trivial coverage. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ ( ᴛ) 06:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
In the first few hours of the gameplay tests in the United States, Australia and New Zealand, Venusaur was the last Pokémon available to be captured, and the rest is basically just a list of media that Venusaur appears in, which, given the nature of Pokémon, is a lot, and, given the nature of Pokémon articles, lacks proper sources. § Reception just feels like listicles, and very important and nuanced criticism like
Steven Hansen felt that Venusaur's Mega Evolution looked "stupid.". I'm not necessarily opposed to merging the article with Bulbasaur rather than List of generation I Pokémon, though. DecafPotato ( talk) 09:21, 9 June 2023 (UTC)