This
alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical
indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Malaysia and
Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This list is absurd. It is open to abuse through cheap publicity - not to mention, thousands of them. Might as well as make list of human (which could go up to more than 6 billion.
__earth(
Talk) 05:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The idea is that only
notable companies are listed... as an approximation, we can remove everything which doesn't have an article.
Kappa 01:06, 13 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Exactly - I have changed the lead and removed all the redlinkers. –
ukexpat (
talk) 18:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
How is this any different from
Category:Companies of Malaysia? No need for a list article that serves the same purpose as a category. This is a candidate for deletion. ~
Amatulić (
talk) 20:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Comes up fairly
often, usually for just that reason. These types of lists seem to get kept, and then turn into directories of external spam links. They don't really bother me if someone is at least keeping track of them and there is some tangible set of inclusion criteria.
Kuru(talk) 02:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Except in this case the only criterion for inclusion is the same as that of a category. ~
Amatulić (
talk) 06:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)reply
This
alphabetical index of Wikipedia articles falls within the scope of the WikiProject Indexes. This is a collaborative effort to create, maintain, and improve alphabetical
indexes on Wikipedia.IndexesWikipedia:WikiProject IndexesTemplate:WikiProject IndexesIndexes articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Malaysia and
Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This list is absurd. It is open to abuse through cheap publicity - not to mention, thousands of them. Might as well as make list of human (which could go up to more than 6 billion.
__earth(
Talk) 05:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)reply
The idea is that only
notable companies are listed... as an approximation, we can remove everything which doesn't have an article.
Kappa 01:06, 13 August 2007 (UTC)reply
Exactly - I have changed the lead and removed all the redlinkers. –
ukexpat (
talk) 18:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)reply
How is this any different from
Category:Companies of Malaysia? No need for a list article that serves the same purpose as a category. This is a candidate for deletion. ~
Amatulić (
talk) 20:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Comes up fairly
often, usually for just that reason. These types of lists seem to get kept, and then turn into directories of external spam links. They don't really bother me if someone is at least keeping track of them and there is some tangible set of inclusion criteria.
Kuru(talk) 02:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Except in this case the only criterion for inclusion is the same as that of a category. ~
Amatulić (
talk) 06:01, 11 January 2013 (UTC)reply
