This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of amphibious assault operations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dave-
There is certainly no harm is this page. As The Great Helmsman said 'Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom,'
On the other hand, it is simply a subset of the Military Operations list. Do we need this one too?
At the least, this page should be linked to the other one. Is there an article on Alligator Warfare? Could you provide one as a header to this list? Are all these operations listed on the Military Operation list.
I have an entry for all these operations on my Mac and will add them to the Vast Database as the Muse strikes me.
Would Gallipoli qualify as a WWI amphibious assault operation? I seem to recall there was also an amphibious landing planned in support of Third Battle of Ypres -- involved landing tanks on barges somewhere beyond Nieuport. I think they got as far as practicing to climb sea-walls in the tanks. I don't know if it had a codename. Geoff 07:01, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
No, it did not have a codename. Trust me, I know. This page would make me get off my dead butt and make entries for all the names mentioned. Of course that would involve me snapping out of my lethargy. [[ PaulinSaudi 11:49, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)]]
What is an "Amphibious assault"? A definitionis needed.
The only Wikipedia template for a nation is for Australia. Should there be templates for the national forces participating, or for the landing places, both, or none? Beyond that, the list itself is not in a table, and does not show the forces or landing places or even, in most cases, the date, just the war, and the names of the battles or landing places. I do not object to this list, but I am doubtful about its utility in its present form.
Any editor who decides to remove the Australia template, rather than add the long series of nations that might be added, please feel free to do so. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 01:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
List of amphibious assault operations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dave-
There is certainly no harm is this page. As The Great Helmsman said 'Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom,'
On the other hand, it is simply a subset of the Military Operations list. Do we need this one too?
At the least, this page should be linked to the other one. Is there an article on Alligator Warfare? Could you provide one as a header to this list? Are all these operations listed on the Military Operation list.
I have an entry for all these operations on my Mac and will add them to the Vast Database as the Muse strikes me.
Would Gallipoli qualify as a WWI amphibious assault operation? I seem to recall there was also an amphibious landing planned in support of Third Battle of Ypres -- involved landing tanks on barges somewhere beyond Nieuport. I think they got as far as practicing to climb sea-walls in the tanks. I don't know if it had a codename. Geoff 07:01, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
No, it did not have a codename. Trust me, I know. This page would make me get off my dead butt and make entries for all the names mentioned. Of course that would involve me snapping out of my lethargy. [[ PaulinSaudi 11:49, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)]]
What is an "Amphibious assault"? A definitionis needed.
The only Wikipedia template for a nation is for Australia. Should there be templates for the national forces participating, or for the landing places, both, or none? Beyond that, the list itself is not in a table, and does not show the forces or landing places or even, in most cases, the date, just the war, and the names of the battles or landing places. I do not object to this list, but I am doubtful about its utility in its present form.
Any editor who decides to remove the Australia template, rather than add the long series of nations that might be added, please feel free to do so. -- DThomsen8 ( talk) 01:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC)