This article was nominated for deletion on 23 January 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I created this page to merge all the pages at Category:Lists of laojiaos in the People's Republic of China and delete the 20-some pages there, as well as the category. To be honest, though, I find this whole thing kind of frivolous, given that the user who originally created these basically did nothing but copy a list out of a single source. I may put this whole page up for deletion later. Just giving everyone a heads-up. — Politizer( talk • contribs ) 23:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
I just realized, I have been formatting all these tables to fit optimally on the page (no sidescrolling, but trying to get them wide enough to minimize the number of cells that go to two lines), but I am doing all of this on Firefox 3.0 on my laptop (1200x800 screen resolution). If anyone else editing this page has other browsers or uses a different resolution, please let me know here if there are any problems (i.e., if the table is too wide). — Politizer( talk • contribs ) 23:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
A Judong RTL in Judong County in Jiangsu is mentioned. According to Rudong County article Rudong county is in Jiangsu. Hence I suppose Judong County is a misspelling. Sarcelles ( talk) 12:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
At http://www.laogai.org/news2/book/handbook2008-all.pdf a new Handbook has been issued. Sarcelles ( talk) 16:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The guessing-game in the discussion above shows the nonsense of a list like this in Wikipedia: every information seems to be taken directly from only one source: the Handbook (with added mistakes). As the case "Judong" shows, the English Wikipedia community is not able to any criticism or corrections. This is not enough. Therefore this list should be checked seriously or deleted. -- Reiner Stoppok ( talk) 22:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
In my opinion, it would obviously be better if we had multiple sources confirming the existence of these facilities. Does the Chinese government publish that data? Are there other independent sources we can add besides the main one? I don't think deletion is in order because the existence of these facilities has been confirmed by multiple sources and there should be a list of them somewhere on Wikipedia. If the existence of certain facilities is in doubt, those should be marked as such so that a search for sources can be commenced. I would recommend enlisting the Chinese Wikipedia's embassy in this pursuit.-- Cdogsimmons ( talk) 01:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
I've gone the long way from German Wikipedia to tell you some mistakes and inconsistencies, therefore I'm not interested in every detail. The lists have been (are) over one year old with the same mistakes, and that was (is) really amusing for me. -- Reiner Stoppok ( talk) 13:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
There is a column town/village. It says in this column 21 kilometers from Hai District or similar. Additionally it has street names. Should they removed or the column be renamed? Sarcelles ( talk) 16:12, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of re-education through labor camps in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
For your information, there is a move discussion in progress on
Talk:Reeducation.
提尔巴 (
talk) 17:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC).
This article was nominated for deletion on 23 January 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I created this page to merge all the pages at Category:Lists of laojiaos in the People's Republic of China and delete the 20-some pages there, as well as the category. To be honest, though, I find this whole thing kind of frivolous, given that the user who originally created these basically did nothing but copy a list out of a single source. I may put this whole page up for deletion later. Just giving everyone a heads-up. — Politizer( talk • contribs ) 23:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
I just realized, I have been formatting all these tables to fit optimally on the page (no sidescrolling, but trying to get them wide enough to minimize the number of cells that go to two lines), but I am doing all of this on Firefox 3.0 on my laptop (1200x800 screen resolution). If anyone else editing this page has other browsers or uses a different resolution, please let me know here if there are any problems (i.e., if the table is too wide). — Politizer( talk • contribs ) 23:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
A Judong RTL in Judong County in Jiangsu is mentioned. According to Rudong County article Rudong county is in Jiangsu. Hence I suppose Judong County is a misspelling. Sarcelles ( talk) 12:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
At http://www.laogai.org/news2/book/handbook2008-all.pdf a new Handbook has been issued. Sarcelles ( talk) 16:13, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The guessing-game in the discussion above shows the nonsense of a list like this in Wikipedia: every information seems to be taken directly from only one source: the Handbook (with added mistakes). As the case "Judong" shows, the English Wikipedia community is not able to any criticism or corrections. This is not enough. Therefore this list should be checked seriously or deleted. -- Reiner Stoppok ( talk) 22:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
In my opinion, it would obviously be better if we had multiple sources confirming the existence of these facilities. Does the Chinese government publish that data? Are there other independent sources we can add besides the main one? I don't think deletion is in order because the existence of these facilities has been confirmed by multiple sources and there should be a list of them somewhere on Wikipedia. If the existence of certain facilities is in doubt, those should be marked as such so that a search for sources can be commenced. I would recommend enlisting the Chinese Wikipedia's embassy in this pursuit.-- Cdogsimmons ( talk) 01:04, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
I've gone the long way from German Wikipedia to tell you some mistakes and inconsistencies, therefore I'm not interested in every detail. The lists have been (are) over one year old with the same mistakes, and that was (is) really amusing for me. -- Reiner Stoppok ( talk) 13:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
There is a column town/village. It says in this column 21 kilometers from Hai District or similar. Additionally it has street names. Should they removed or the column be renamed? Sarcelles ( talk) 16:12, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of re-education through labor camps in China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
For your information, there is a move discussion in progress on
Talk:Reeducation.
提尔巴 (
talk) 17:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC).