This article was nominated for deletion on 8 November 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 31 October 2017 by reviewer Ritchie333 ( talk · contribs). Role-playing games Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Pathfinder Unchained is in there twice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.1.220.125 ( talk) 08:37, 4 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Most of the Pathfinder Adventure Path books are missing. See: https://www.paizo.com/store/pathfinder/adventures/adventurePath -- 94.134.89.164 ( talk) 14:21, 16 December 2018 (UTC) reply

Second Darkness to Carrion Crown #1 and the last three Extinction Curse have been added. I'll work on adding the rest. Audace1234 ( talk) 14:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.118.42.146 ( talk) reply

Should we add a short description of every APs? I've seen the DnD list of books been doing that, and feel it'd add relevancy to the page... Audace1234 ( talk) 14:44, 10 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Should the Pathfinder Lost Omens line include Lost Omens on every single title? On paizo.com, it's written as Pathfinder Lost Omens: [title of the book]. I think it's intended to just be "World Guide" or "Character Guide" or "Legends". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Audace1234 ( talk • contribs) 19:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC) reply

The Mwangi Expanse lacks the "Lost Omens" on the spine of the book itself. It also features a different spine in that the cover art wraps. I don't know if it is better to treat the larger Lost Omens books (perhaps like the Absalom book) as separate from the rest. 96.224.38.187 ( talk) 16:50, 10 September 2021 (UTC) reply

"Absalom" also has cover art wrap and lacks "Lost Omens" on the spine, but then Grand Bazaar does not have cover art wrap, but lacks "Lost Omens" on the spine. So there's definitely two Lost Omens lines (cover art wrap vs non), but I don't know if they should be tracked separately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.224.38.187 ( talk) 16:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC) reply

For most of the release dates of the first edition rulebooks, the dates used are the Amazon listing dates, which are often inaccurate to the date that Paizo targets and authorizes resellers to sell. Below are more accurate dates, typically using the PDF release date (which Paizo always pushes forward to match the retail release date), or, in the case Archive.org didn't capture that date, a comment or article from the Paizo site.

I will edit the table in the article reflect these dates.

68.41.175.4 ( talk) 06:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC) reply

It seems several of the publications here have citations next to their names that are simply self-promotion of obscure review blogs.

I'm not sure what value these citations bring, they aren't necessary to establish that a product was made when we have the ISBNs, pubcodes, and even official links in the list.

I'd like to remove these. 68.41.175.4 ( talk) 14:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC) reply