This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
{{User:WildBot/m04|sect=
I guess I don't understand why it's been done this way. It doesn't encourage creating the necessary articles. dm 03:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
A process outside of WP:NRHP has started which would change wordings to "Washington, D.C." from what has been practice in WP:NRHP "the District of Columbia".
This got stirred up by proposal to create Category:National Historic Landmarks in the District of Columbia, which is now suggested to be "in Washington, D.C." instead.
Assuming these go through, then I predict that the current titles of list-articles List of Registered Historic Places in the District of Columbia and List of National Historic Landmarks in the District of Columbia would also be changed.
If you care about this, participate by discussing here on the talk page of WP:NRHP if you like, but especially by voting or commenting in the category change process. doncram ( talk) 12:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
I am going to begin fixing the 'descriptions' of these sites, which, frankly, are so obvious as to be useless. Explaining that a house named for an individual is maybe the home of that individual is not helpful. Even less so is the description of Tudor Place as a 'place'. That's just dumb. Dpenn89 ( talk) 18:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:National Historic Landmark which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 22:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
{{User:WildBot/m04|sect=
I guess I don't understand why it's been done this way. It doesn't encourage creating the necessary articles. dm 03:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
A process outside of WP:NRHP has started which would change wordings to "Washington, D.C." from what has been practice in WP:NRHP "the District of Columbia".
This got stirred up by proposal to create Category:National Historic Landmarks in the District of Columbia, which is now suggested to be "in Washington, D.C." instead.
Assuming these go through, then I predict that the current titles of list-articles List of Registered Historic Places in the District of Columbia and List of National Historic Landmarks in the District of Columbia would also be changed.
If you care about this, participate by discussing here on the talk page of WP:NRHP if you like, but especially by voting or commenting in the category change process. doncram ( talk) 12:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
I am going to begin fixing the 'descriptions' of these sites, which, frankly, are so obvious as to be useless. Explaining that a house named for an individual is maybe the home of that individual is not helpful. Even less so is the description of Tudor Place as a 'place'. That's just dumb. Dpenn89 ( talk) 18:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:National Historic Landmark which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 22:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)