This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe the zone of apoptosis for the early allocation and progenitor expansion model should be 200 microns--not 200 mm. I'm no expert, so I'll leave this to someone more knowledgable than me to correct if necessary.
Dispite they have different origins?-- MathFacts ( talk) 10:12, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
why does this article fail to mention the two signal model for proximal distal patterning. it is one of the most well subscribed models and has much evidence that supports its validity — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.133.11.188 ( talk) 19:53, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Would it be appropriate to add a link to a page that is related, but does not exist yet (limb evolution)? To this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nvarade ( talk • contribs) 15:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Ecapelle ( talk) 04:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Limb development. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
There is a lot of overlap . Both pages are not overly long and would be better presented on one page Iztwoz ( talk) 17:08, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Some researchers working on the limb see themselves as part of the emerging discipline of evodevo, but most by far see themselves and either developmental or evolutionary biologists. It's inaccurate to make limb development studies part of evodevo in the introduction, and particularly the opening sentence. StN ( talk) 04:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
"An interesting aspect in understanding limb development is addressing the question of how snakes lost their legs. Snakes are a particularly good example for studying limb loss, as they underwent limb loss and regeneration multiple times throughout their evolution before they finally lost their legs for good."
The linked source does not talk about snakes or their gain and loss, it talks about digit identity
Where does this information come from? 2001:7C0:28E0:108:FCBF:E0E9:31B7:DDB7 ( talk) 13:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 24 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Luziacat ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Luziacat ( talk) 22:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe the zone of apoptosis for the early allocation and progenitor expansion model should be 200 microns--not 200 mm. I'm no expert, so I'll leave this to someone more knowledgable than me to correct if necessary.
Dispite they have different origins?-- MathFacts ( talk) 10:12, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
why does this article fail to mention the two signal model for proximal distal patterning. it is one of the most well subscribed models and has much evidence that supports its validity — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.133.11.188 ( talk) 19:53, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Would it be appropriate to add a link to a page that is related, but does not exist yet (limb evolution)? To this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nvarade ( talk • contribs) 15:47, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Ecapelle ( talk) 04:08, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Limb development. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
There is a lot of overlap . Both pages are not overly long and would be better presented on one page Iztwoz ( talk) 17:08, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Some researchers working on the limb see themselves as part of the emerging discipline of evodevo, but most by far see themselves and either developmental or evolutionary biologists. It's inaccurate to make limb development studies part of evodevo in the introduction, and particularly the opening sentence. StN ( talk) 04:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
"An interesting aspect in understanding limb development is addressing the question of how snakes lost their legs. Snakes are a particularly good example for studying limb loss, as they underwent limb loss and regeneration multiple times throughout their evolution before they finally lost their legs for good."
The linked source does not talk about snakes or their gain and loss, it talks about digit identity
Where does this information come from? 2001:7C0:28E0:108:FCBF:E0E9:31B7:DDB7 ( talk) 13:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 24 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Luziacat ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Luziacat ( talk) 22:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)