Lake Geneva station has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 3, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna ( talk · contribs) 16:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Earwig says good to go.
I wish both images used were of higher quality, but alas Wikipedia must obey by copyright laws and make do with what we have:
File:Lake Geneva station (2), August 27, 2001.jpg
okay, valid reuse rationale;File:Lake Geneva station (1), August 27, 2001.jpg
okay, valid reuse rationale.All the citations are RS and used correctly.
Spot checks on refs 1, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10 and 12 show no concerns—they all support the article's content.
Lake Geneva station has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 3, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna ( talk · contribs) 16:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Earwig says good to go.
I wish both images used were of higher quality, but alas Wikipedia must obey by copyright laws and make do with what we have:
File:Lake Geneva station (2), August 27, 2001.jpg
okay, valid reuse rationale;File:Lake Geneva station (1), August 27, 2001.jpg
okay, valid reuse rationale.All the citations are RS and used correctly.
Spot checks on refs 1, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10 and 12 show no concerns—they all support the article's content.