From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2006

I'm just wandering, should this be considered a stub anymore? It seems fairly well detailed. Kycowboyntv 16:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC) reply

I just deleted the stub icon.  QuizQuick  23:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC) reply

July 2007

Please add pictures for a higher article rating (b class). Thank you! Kycowboyntv 03:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC) reply

I'm not sure a high school baseball team would have the notability necessary for its own article; suggest merging the accomplishments and notable team members with the article on the school. 331dot ( talk) 14:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Other than the state championships, which is already in the article and unreferenced in both places, there is nothing to merge. Nearly all of the team article is content that would not be encyclopedic in a school article. High school sports teams do not generally have articles on Wikipedia: as such, I do not even see it as a plausable search term. I will be nominating that article for deletion. John from Idegon ( talk) 19:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)  Done reply
@ John from Idegon: Works for me. I agree that there should not be an article on the team. 331dot ( talk) 19:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC) reply

reversion rationale

John from Idegon ( talk · contribs) reverted my expansion of the article saying, "Unsourced changes". However, in my expansion of 13 August 2019 at 17:28 UTC, everything I added to the article was duly sourced to a reliable source. Can anybody explain John from Idegon's edit? — fourthords | =Λ= | 18:13, 13 August 2019 (UTC) reply

I'd suggest you read the guidelines for school articles at WP:SCH/AG and in light of those guidelines, please make an argument for inclusion of what you have added. We do not list staff, we use secondary sources for attendance, etc. I see nothing constructive in your changes. John from Idegon ( talk) 18:30, 13 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Ah, so not "Unsourced changes", but "changes out of compliance with WikiProject guidelines". That being corrected: you removed enrollment statistics, the school's address & classification, and staffing numbers that were all sourced to National Center for Education Statistics, yet WikiProject Schools' article guidelines say nothing about prohibiting that information or that source. In fact, those facts are specifically called-out as appropriate for inclusion; how is it not constructive? — fourthords | =Λ= | 19:07, 13 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Should more details about the SCAPA and Pre-Engineering programs be included?

For example, the available arts to major in inside of the SCAPA program, and what being in the Pre-Engineering program entails. Checkerberry ( talk) 22:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC) reply

That would be great, but content must first derive from citations to published reliable sources, and the sources already in the article have been wrung out. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 02:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2006

I'm just wandering, should this be considered a stub anymore? It seems fairly well detailed. Kycowboyntv 16:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC) reply

I just deleted the stub icon.  QuizQuick  23:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC) reply

July 2007

Please add pictures for a higher article rating (b class). Thank you! Kycowboyntv 03:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC) reply

I'm not sure a high school baseball team would have the notability necessary for its own article; suggest merging the accomplishments and notable team members with the article on the school. 331dot ( talk) 14:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC) reply

Other than the state championships, which is already in the article and unreferenced in both places, there is nothing to merge. Nearly all of the team article is content that would not be encyclopedic in a school article. High school sports teams do not generally have articles on Wikipedia: as such, I do not even see it as a plausable search term. I will be nominating that article for deletion. John from Idegon ( talk) 19:22, 28 April 2016 (UTC)  Done reply
@ John from Idegon: Works for me. I agree that there should not be an article on the team. 331dot ( talk) 19:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC) reply

reversion rationale

John from Idegon ( talk · contribs) reverted my expansion of the article saying, "Unsourced changes". However, in my expansion of 13 August 2019 at 17:28 UTC, everything I added to the article was duly sourced to a reliable source. Can anybody explain John from Idegon's edit? — fourthords | =Λ= | 18:13, 13 August 2019 (UTC) reply

I'd suggest you read the guidelines for school articles at WP:SCH/AG and in light of those guidelines, please make an argument for inclusion of what you have added. We do not list staff, we use secondary sources for attendance, etc. I see nothing constructive in your changes. John from Idegon ( talk) 18:30, 13 August 2019 (UTC) reply
Ah, so not "Unsourced changes", but "changes out of compliance with WikiProject guidelines". That being corrected: you removed enrollment statistics, the school's address & classification, and staffing numbers that were all sourced to National Center for Education Statistics, yet WikiProject Schools' article guidelines say nothing about prohibiting that information or that source. In fact, those facts are specifically called-out as appropriate for inclusion; how is it not constructive? — fourthords | =Λ= | 19:07, 13 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Should more details about the SCAPA and Pre-Engineering programs be included?

For example, the available arts to major in inside of the SCAPA program, and what being in the Pre-Engineering program entails. Checkerberry ( talk) 22:11, 25 September 2023 (UTC) reply

That would be great, but content must first derive from citations to published reliable sources, and the sources already in the article have been wrung out. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 02:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook