A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 1, 2007, July 1, 2008, and July 1, 2019. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have copied this section from Hernan Cortes. It is not very encyclopedic but I didn't want to remove it. Piet 13:16, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
I think it is a mistake to have moved this section from Hernan Cortes. I agree that both that article and this one need quite a bit of editing but I think we should consider moving some or all of this back to the Hernan Cortes article. I'm not going to do that but I think the idea deserves discussion. It is true that some of the text is "not encyclopedic" but most of the content of the La Noche Triste article is and so the "not encyclopedic" criticism is not sufficient to warrant moving this out of the Hernan Cortes article.
If it make sense to move La Noche Triste out of the Hernan Cortes article, then it would also make sense to move other descriptions of military campaigns e.g. the defeat of the Tlaxcaltecas or the Destruction of Cholula. Richard 00:33, 26 March 2006 (PST)
I feel bad to assess this differently from how the Aztec Project already has. But this is a pretty short article, with no infoboxes or pictures. I suppose the existence of so many other closely related articles ( Siege of Tenochtitlan, The massacre in the Main Temple, Tenochtitlán) force this article to be shorter; so much of what could be said here is already covered in other places. Still, there are plenty of articles much longer and much more detailed that have a B-class designation... LordAmeth 17:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
However he did despair and of all he lost he asked after only one, Martin Lopez, the shipbuilder. When told he was alive he said, "Vamos, que faltamos nada." ("Let's go for we lack nothing.") What the fuck is this supposed to mean? Especially that first sentence... it's unsalvageable! Can the original author clarify? Stormchaser ( talk) 16:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Article reassessed and graded as start class. -- dashiellx ( talk) 18:58, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
This article says she was Cortés' mistress but her article says she was someone else's wife. I think it is highly unlikely she was both at the same time. GS3 ( talk) 19:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on La Noche Triste. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 1, 2007, July 1, 2008, and July 1, 2019. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have copied this section from Hernan Cortes. It is not very encyclopedic but I didn't want to remove it. Piet 13:16, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
I think it is a mistake to have moved this section from Hernan Cortes. I agree that both that article and this one need quite a bit of editing but I think we should consider moving some or all of this back to the Hernan Cortes article. I'm not going to do that but I think the idea deserves discussion. It is true that some of the text is "not encyclopedic" but most of the content of the La Noche Triste article is and so the "not encyclopedic" criticism is not sufficient to warrant moving this out of the Hernan Cortes article.
If it make sense to move La Noche Triste out of the Hernan Cortes article, then it would also make sense to move other descriptions of military campaigns e.g. the defeat of the Tlaxcaltecas or the Destruction of Cholula. Richard 00:33, 26 March 2006 (PST)
I feel bad to assess this differently from how the Aztec Project already has. But this is a pretty short article, with no infoboxes or pictures. I suppose the existence of so many other closely related articles ( Siege of Tenochtitlan, The massacre in the Main Temple, Tenochtitlán) force this article to be shorter; so much of what could be said here is already covered in other places. Still, there are plenty of articles much longer and much more detailed that have a B-class designation... LordAmeth 17:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
However he did despair and of all he lost he asked after only one, Martin Lopez, the shipbuilder. When told he was alive he said, "Vamos, que faltamos nada." ("Let's go for we lack nothing.") What the fuck is this supposed to mean? Especially that first sentence... it's unsalvageable! Can the original author clarify? Stormchaser ( talk) 16:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Article reassessed and graded as start class. -- dashiellx ( talk) 18:58, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
This article says she was Cortés' mistress but her article says she was someone else's wife. I think it is highly unlikely she was both at the same time. GS3 ( talk) 19:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on La Noche Triste. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)