This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
On 4 November 2023, it was proposed that this article be
moved from
LIGNA to
Ligna. The result of
the discussion was Moved.
Requested move 4 November 2023
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. Consensus is that the title is not an acronym and that
MOS:TM's guidance cuts against capitalizing this article subject's name. (
closed by non-admin page mover) —
Red-tailed hawk(nest) 15:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. It's not an acronym.
Dicklyon (
talk) 00:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support clearly not an acronym nor is there any evidence that most sources use an allcaps stylization.--
67.70.101.104 (
talk) 01:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support Not an acronym. No evidence that it meets the threshold for allcaps per
MOS:TM.
Cinderella157 (
talk) 05:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
On 4 November 2023, it was proposed that this article be
moved from
LIGNA to
Ligna. The result of
the discussion was Moved.
Requested move 4 November 2023
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. Consensus is that the title is not an acronym and that
MOS:TM's guidance cuts against capitalizing this article subject's name. (
closed by non-admin page mover) —
Red-tailed hawk(nest) 15:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. It's not an acronym.
Dicklyon (
talk) 00:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support clearly not an acronym nor is there any evidence that most sources use an allcaps stylization.--
67.70.101.104 (
talk) 01:52, 5 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Support Not an acronym. No evidence that it meets the threshold for allcaps per
MOS:TM.
Cinderella157 (
talk) 05:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.