(Redirected from
Talk:Karma (JoJo Siwa song))
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Karma (2024 song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Where it says Siwa was inspired to create music like Avery Cyrus’s “Bangerz”, it should say Miley Cyrus.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7081:443b:a6a6:4d9:5ac4:9b52:6520 ( talk) 00:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 | It has been proposed in this section that
Karma (2024 song) be
renamed and moved to
Karma's a Bitch. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{
subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{
requested move/dated}} directly. |
Karma (2024 song) → Karma's a Bitch – This page keeps getting moved. The previous rationale was "The song was originally called that in the Miley Cyrus demo, and the Brit Smith demo. It also takes away the disambiguating, so it more succinct." I’m unsure, however. The article is about the song as an entity, but that 'entity' hasn’t got a name, but it’s clear that there are two versions of the same song, and that they are not covers of each other. I don’t think this has ever happened before. Plus the proposed title is already a redirect to the page, so seems like the most logical title. This is a case of 'what came first, the chicken or the egg?' Another suggestion is Karma and Karma's a Bitch. 109.235.247.80 ( talk) 01:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- No. The Siwa song is independently notable. On the other hand, the Brit Smith version is only notable because of Siwa's song. The fact that this article lends equal weight to the two versions is incorrect and should be changed.
Llacb47 (
talk) 02:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting angle. I’m undecided on what the weight for both versions should be, as the Smith version was only released a few days ago. The article currently reads that it entered the iTunes chart at number 8, whereas Siwa's version entered at 89 which can’t be ignored. Plus it seems to be growing in notability. 109.235.247.80 ( talk) 02:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Agree. This needs to be moved back to Karma (JoJo Siwa song). The Brit Smith version (even if it's the better version to me), would've never surfaced without the release of JoJo's. Theknine2 ( talk) 07:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I completely agree with this view, and I have also contributed on this thread, but I think for now this is the best course of action. It's not a similar scenario to that of "Fast Car" yet for example, where the song has been covered so many times people aren't looking for one specific artist. Whenever people think of Smith's version, they think of Siwa because that came first in quick succession (a few weeks apart from each other). Helpingpeopleyay ( talk) 07:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. There has been a lot of similarities between the 2 songs especially the one by Brit Smith which has a lot of history behind the creation and success of it which I think differentiates it a lot from the one by Jojo Siwa. Wiiformii ( talk) 03:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think it depends in time, but the wikipedia page should remain as JoJo siwa's now. At the moment, Brit Smith's song is charting extremely high because of the controversy surrounding it. If the song goes on to be more successful than JoJo Siwa's in total, then it might be worth changing the page to the name it has currently "Karma (2024 version)". However, this has not happened yet, and Smith's version is only popular because of Siwa. Miley Cyrus' full song hasn't even released yet I'm sure, so I don't know why an unreleased song that has now had its rights sold constitutes a say in the naming of the article. The name should NOT be "Karma's a Bitch" however. That completely nullifies Siwa's version and causes confusion because Siwa's was first, and what brought Smith's to fame. The song is now called "Karma". When the rights were sold, that's what it was named. Regardless of Smith's version, it came into the public sphere as "Karma" and should remain that way. Tl;dr: It should be left as JoJo Siwa's page for now, but if Smith's obliterates Siwas and remains the more popular version rather than famous because of Siwa, it should be changed to "2024 Version" - which seems like a course that may happen in the near future, but is only causing confusion for now. It shouldn't be changed to Smith's version because it isn't independent of Smith or Cyrus. Helpingpeopleyay ( talk) 07:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Per WP:SONGDAB, we don't use the name of a cover artist for the song's article. Both versions are notable (unlike something like Kitty (Racey song) / Mickey (Toni Basil song).) The fact that the original became notable after the release of the cover version is a bit unusual, but it shouldn't stop us from sticking to the established naming convention. Karma (2024 song) and Karma (JoJo Siwa song) can continue to redirect here.
- Also, I disagree with OP's statement that JoJo Siwa's version is not a cover. It definitely is. Some copyediting of the article is needed, but I'll let the RM play out first.
162 etc. (
talk) 17:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think I responded to you before but Karma by JoJo Siwa is most certiantly not a cover because the rights were sold to her. The version that has been released by Brit Smith is a Demo. It would be wrong to call Smiths' the first version either, because it was intended for Miley Cyrus first. JoJo Siwa is the first official releasing of the song, and it is by luck that the demo has been officially released by Smith. The same goes for songs that are covered - Fast Car is an example. I mentioned this before as well, but for those who might not see that, music is often demoed by multiple different artists, The Middle (Zedd, Maren Morris and Grey song) and God Is a Woman being two prominent examples I can think that reached mainstream sucess that were not made for the final released artist. Helpingpeopleyay ( talk) 04:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Move back to Karma (JoJo Siwa song) for now: The page should not have been moved to 2024 song, as that is against
WP:SONGDAB. Karma is also the WP:COMMONNAME for JoJo’s version and roughly half of the sources for Brit’s refer to her version as “the original version of JoJo’s Karma”. Once more RSs pick up on this and it is clearer which one has the more lasting notability this can be revisited, it is too soon to assume Brit’s will be more notable long term.
This page structure was clearer in my opinion.
CAMERAwMUSTACHE (
talk) 18:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- To further clarify, JoJo’s version is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC because her version kick-started this whole thing and was the first to be officially released. None of the others would be notable without hers as they would just be obscure demos had it not been for the whole JoJo thing prompting their virality.
CAMERAwMUSTACHE (
talk) 19:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is not in play here; that would mean moving the song's article to Karma, and all will agree that that doesn't make sense.
- Whether the JoJo Siwa song is more notable or not is also irrelevant; again, per
WP:SONGDAB, we use the first performer of the song for the title. That's why we have
Torn (Ednaswap song) and
1985 (SR-71 song), even though the Natalie Imbruglia and Bowling for Soup versions are far more notable.
162 etc. (
talk) 21:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- The Siwa version was the first version to be released, does that change anything?
Llacb47 (
talk) 21:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Like I mentioned, it is unusual that the cover was released before the original, which was recorded 12 years earlier and shelved. That being said: JoJo Siwa covered a song that was originally performed by Brit Smith, not the other way around. It's therefore inaccurate, and against established naming convention, to call this a JoJo Siwa song.
162 etc. (
talk) 22:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Selling music is so prevalent in the music industry. I want you to read this article right now and come back: The Middle (Zedd, Maren Morris and Grey song)
- This song was "covered" by 12 people before the final version was released. Does this mean that the title of that wikipedia page should be "The Middle (2018 song)"? It doesn't make sense.
Helpingpeopleyay (
talk) 04:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I see a distinction here because the early demos of "The Middle" are not independently notable - they never got a proper release, never charted, etc. Brit's Smith's song did.
162 etc. (
talk) 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's true, and makes this case somewhat unique (frustratingly). But I linked that article mainly to show that once a song gets officially released, legally it becomes the artist's property. JoJo Siwa basically made Smith's song official with her version. Although Smith's version started as a demo, I think you'd be correct in saying that Smith's version has become independently notable because they released in close proximity, and went viral at the same time. I wonder though why a different wikipedia article can't be made for Smith's version entirely? The songs are the same, but are also different in enough ways, with enough substance and reliable sources to justify standalone wikipedia articles, despite being inherently linked. Would it be incorrect to create a new wikipedia page for Smith's song entirely rather than merging them? Is there a wikipedia policy on this? Otherwise, for now I think the current title of this article is actually all-encompassing and should remain.
Helpingpeopleyay (
talk) 05:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Per
WP:NCOVER, "Notable covers are eligible for standalone articles, provided that the article on the cover can be reasonably-detailed based on facts independent of the original." Whether that's the case here is a different discussion that is beyond the scope of this RM. See also
WP:SPLIT.
162 etc. (
talk) 05:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree that Karma is a cover though. If Smith's version was never released, the song would still stand alone? This is still Siwa's version of the song because she bought the rights? Both are their own versions, there is no cover version - if we were to say that, then this article should be named after the Miley Cyrus version because she recorded a demo first but didn't end up releasing it. Even though Smith officially released her demo, that would still make her's a cover because she wasn't the first to sing it.
Helpingpeopleyay (
talk) 06:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Smith's has been officially released. Miley has not released hers at all. Let alone do we know if Miley even recorded it, that is all alleged. What we do know is Brit Smith recorded hers in 2012 and has since released the recording which is also doing better than Siwa's right now. 96.43.189.203 ( talk) 15:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's unfair to call JoJo's version a 'cover'. Brit Smith's recording was scrapped and would have never seen the light of day if not for JoJo's release. Many songs are shopped around, demoed, and tested with multiple artists; I don't think it'd be fair to call the final versions of those songs 'covers'. Notably, songs that have been 're-recorded' and released by different artists to those who wrote it:
- - Party in the USA, Miley Cyrus ( originally written and performed by Jessie J)
- - Irreplaceable, Beyonce ( originally written and performed by Ne-Yo)
- - Black Widow, Iggy Azalea ( originally written and performed by Katy Perry)
- Among many other examples, the aforementioned demos are all recorded and scrapped from their respective original albums. Is it then fair to say that these songs are all 'covers' of their original demos? If Jessie J were to release her original demo for Party in the USA, would Miley's song become a 'cover', despite it being the first version officially released and marketed?
- I feel as though this scrutiny on JoJo's release is unfairly targeted at her performance of the song. We're yet to see whether Brit Smith's version has longevity or notoriety outside of the buzz generated by JoJo's release -- it makes no sense for this article to be a double-feature, rather than an article focused on the original release of the song (JoJo's) and the controversy/follow up release of a demo of the song.
172.113.242.243 (
talk) 23:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I feel like you were able to put into words what I was thinking, I agree. The practice of selling demos is common, so this case shouldn't be treated so differently.
Helpingpeopleyay (
talk) 00:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with you -- I think much of the controversy online is coming from a misunderstanding of how common of a practise this is in the industry. It's a shame that this song in particular is being trashed so heavily while artists like Ariana Grande, Beyonce, Rihanna, etc, all perform songs not made by them. Some go as far incorporate the demo vocals in the final product (see S&M where Ester Dean's vocals are present throughout the riffs and This Is What You Came For where Taylor Swift's vocals are present throughout the chorus).
- I think retroactively calling something a cover because it was recorded before the first release of a song is unfair. While Brit Smith's recording is more of an 'original', it is not the first performance to be released. I think most people would agree that it'd be silly to call popular songs covers if, theoretically, their demos were to be released officially.
- I think weighting both of these songs equally is unfair to the fact that JoJo was the first to person to have acquired/performed this song to release it. Retroactively marking its significance as the same of an un-released (now-released) demo is a dangerous precedent to set for any future artist who chooses to release/perform a song they wrote but later handed to another artist. 172.113.242.243 ( talk) 03:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- I feel like you were able to put into words what I was thinking, I agree. The practice of selling demos is common, so this case shouldn't be treated so differently.
Helpingpeopleyay (
talk) 00:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree that Karma is a cover though. If Smith's version was never released, the song would still stand alone? This is still Siwa's version of the song because she bought the rights? Both are their own versions, there is no cover version - if we were to say that, then this article should be named after the Miley Cyrus version because she recorded a demo first but didn't end up releasing it. Even though Smith officially released her demo, that would still make her's a cover because she wasn't the first to sing it.
Helpingpeopleyay (
talk) 06:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Per
WP:NCOVER, "Notable covers are eligible for standalone articles, provided that the article on the cover can be reasonably-detailed based on facts independent of the original." Whether that's the case here is a different discussion that is beyond the scope of this RM. See also
WP:SPLIT.
162 etc. (
talk) 05:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's true, and makes this case somewhat unique (frustratingly). But I linked that article mainly to show that once a song gets officially released, legally it becomes the artist's property. JoJo Siwa basically made Smith's song official with her version. Although Smith's version started as a demo, I think you'd be correct in saying that Smith's version has become independently notable because they released in close proximity, and went viral at the same time. I wonder though why a different wikipedia article can't be made for Smith's version entirely? The songs are the same, but are also different in enough ways, with enough substance and reliable sources to justify standalone wikipedia articles, despite being inherently linked. Would it be incorrect to create a new wikipedia page for Smith's song entirely rather than merging them? Is there a wikipedia policy on this? Otherwise, for now I think the current title of this article is actually all-encompassing and should remain.
Helpingpeopleyay (
talk) 05:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I see a distinction here because the early demos of "The Middle" are not independently notable - they never got a proper release, never charted, etc. Brit's Smith's song did.
162 etc. (
talk) 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Like I mentioned, it is unusual that the cover was released before the original, which was recorded 12 years earlier and shelved. That being said: JoJo Siwa covered a song that was originally performed by Brit Smith, not the other way around. It's therefore inaccurate, and against established naming convention, to call this a JoJo Siwa song.
162 etc. (
talk) 22:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- The Siwa version was the first version to be released, does that change anything?
Llacb47 (
talk) 21:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- To further clarify, JoJo’s version is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC because her version kick-started this whole thing and was the first to be officially released. None of the others would be notable without hers as they would just be obscure demos had it not been for the whole JoJo thing prompting their virality.
CAMERAwMUSTACHE (
talk) 19:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A
demo is usually understood to mean a "rough draft" of a song. That's not the case with "Karma's a Bitch" - it's a fully-finished product, with production by
Timbaland and music video by
Marc Klasfeld. The song (and video) we see today is exactly the same one that was released - albeit without fanfare - over 10 years ago.
162 etc. (
talk) 14:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- While I agree that typically a demo would be considered a rough draft, many songs released by large artists (like Party in the USA by Jessie J) were fully produced and later scrapped, before it was handed to Miley Cyrus with some lyrics mildly re-worked. I think it comes down to a question of whether something can be made a cover retroactively —- hypothetically, if Jessie J were to release her version today, would Miley‘s version become a cover over a decade after release? 172.113.242.243 ( talk) 22:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Move back to Karma (JoJo Siwa song) This is the correct course. That was the original version that was released publicly. A lot of this maneuvering is just to spite JoJo. PuppyMonkey ( talk) 06:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)- Keep as Karma (2024 song) for now. It is unclear what the title should be at this point as none of the original or suggested titles accurately convey the article's current scope. PuppyMonkey ( talk) 07:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I can't decide on a clear vote, but as the OP says: the article is about the song "as an entity". That "entity" is called "Karma's a Bitch". It just so happens to be that Smith also named her version that, and Siwa used a different name. Titling it "Karma's a Bitch" would be to name the 'entity', not to title it because of it's the name of Smith's version. 86.31.83.194 ( talk) 18:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Songs can be released under different titles (i.e. Many of Horror, recorded by Matt Cardle as " When We Collide"). I would stick with the title of the first official release, "Karma". Heartfox ( talk) 03:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
It's stated at one point in the article that the song was written for Miley Cyrus in 2011. However, the next sentence says that Cyrus allegedly recorded a demo of the song for potential inclusion on her 2010 album Can't Be Tamed. How? 84.69.3.175 ( talk) 21:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Singers can release songs as singles during the album's 'era'. That doesn't mean it still can't be included on the album.
- Either way the claim Miley recorded it in 2011 is all alleged but backed by reliable sources.
96.43.189.203 (
talk) 22:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- The article says that it was written (not recorded) in 2011, at least more than five months after the release of Can't Be Tamed (2010), which it's said the song was allegedly recorded for. The problem is that a song can't be released if it hadn't yet been written, so unless there was a scrapped reissue of Can't Be Tamed set to be released in 2011, the earliest album "Karma's a Bitch" could have been considered for is Bangerz (2013). 84.69.3.175 ( talk) 20:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Why’d that get removed? Or maybe I’m confused. SAYITWITHYOURCHEST ( talk) 00:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
(Redirected from
Talk:Karma (JoJo Siwa song))
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Karma (2024 song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Where it says Siwa was inspired to create music like Avery Cyrus’s “Bangerz”, it should say Miley Cyrus.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7081:443b:a6a6:4d9:5ac4:9b52:6520 ( talk) 00:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
| It has been proposed in this section that
Karma (2024 song) be
renamed and moved to
Karma's a Bitch. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{
subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{
requested move/dated}} directly. |
Karma (2024 song) → Karma's a Bitch – This page keeps getting moved. The previous rationale was "The song was originally called that in the Miley Cyrus demo, and the Brit Smith demo. It also takes away the disambiguating, so it more succinct." I’m unsure, however. The article is about the song as an entity, but that 'entity' hasn’t got a name, but it’s clear that there are two versions of the same song, and that they are not covers of each other. I don’t think this has ever happened before. Plus the proposed title is already a redirect to the page, so seems like the most logical title. This is a case of 'what came first, the chicken or the egg?' Another suggestion is Karma and Karma's a Bitch. 109.235.247.80 ( talk) 01:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- No. The Siwa song is independently notable. On the other hand, the Brit Smith version is only notable because of Siwa's song. The fact that this article lends equal weight to the two versions is incorrect and should be changed.
Llacb47 (
talk) 02:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting angle. I’m undecided on what the weight for both versions should be, as the Smith version was only released a few days ago. The article currently reads that it entered the iTunes chart at number 8, whereas Siwa's version entered at 89 which can’t be ignored. Plus it seems to be growing in notability. 109.235.247.80 ( talk) 02:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Agree. This needs to be moved back to Karma (JoJo Siwa song). The Brit Smith version (even if it's the better version to me), would've never surfaced without the release of JoJo's. Theknine2 ( talk) 07:08, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I completely agree with this view, and I have also contributed on this thread, but I think for now this is the best course of action. It's not a similar scenario to that of "Fast Car" yet for example, where the song has been covered so many times people aren't looking for one specific artist. Whenever people think of Smith's version, they think of Siwa because that came first in quick succession (a few weeks apart from each other). Helpingpeopleyay ( talk) 07:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. There has been a lot of similarities between the 2 songs especially the one by Brit Smith which has a lot of history behind the creation and success of it which I think differentiates it a lot from the one by Jojo Siwa. Wiiformii ( talk) 03:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think it depends in time, but the wikipedia page should remain as JoJo siwa's now. At the moment, Brit Smith's song is charting extremely high because of the controversy surrounding it. If the song goes on to be more successful than JoJo Siwa's in total, then it might be worth changing the page to the name it has currently "Karma (2024 version)". However, this has not happened yet, and Smith's version is only popular because of Siwa. Miley Cyrus' full song hasn't even released yet I'm sure, so I don't know why an unreleased song that has now had its rights sold constitutes a say in the naming of the article. The name should NOT be "Karma's a Bitch" however. That completely nullifies Siwa's version and causes confusion because Siwa's was first, and what brought Smith's to fame. The song is now called "Karma". When the rights were sold, that's what it was named. Regardless of Smith's version, it came into the public sphere as "Karma" and should remain that way. Tl;dr: It should be left as JoJo Siwa's page for now, but if Smith's obliterates Siwas and remains the more popular version rather than famous because of Siwa, it should be changed to "2024 Version" - which seems like a course that may happen in the near future, but is only causing confusion for now. It shouldn't be changed to Smith's version because it isn't independent of Smith or Cyrus. Helpingpeopleyay ( talk) 07:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Per WP:SONGDAB, we don't use the name of a cover artist for the song's article. Both versions are notable (unlike something like Kitty (Racey song) / Mickey (Toni Basil song).) The fact that the original became notable after the release of the cover version is a bit unusual, but it shouldn't stop us from sticking to the established naming convention. Karma (2024 song) and Karma (JoJo Siwa song) can continue to redirect here.
- Also, I disagree with OP's statement that JoJo Siwa's version is not a cover. It definitely is. Some copyediting of the article is needed, but I'll let the RM play out first.
162 etc. (
talk) 17:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think I responded to you before but Karma by JoJo Siwa is most certiantly not a cover because the rights were sold to her. The version that has been released by Brit Smith is a Demo. It would be wrong to call Smiths' the first version either, because it was intended for Miley Cyrus first. JoJo Siwa is the first official releasing of the song, and it is by luck that the demo has been officially released by Smith. The same goes for songs that are covered - Fast Car is an example. I mentioned this before as well, but for those who might not see that, music is often demoed by multiple different artists, The Middle (Zedd, Maren Morris and Grey song) and God Is a Woman being two prominent examples I can think that reached mainstream sucess that were not made for the final released artist. Helpingpeopleyay ( talk) 04:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Move back to Karma (JoJo Siwa song) for now: The page should not have been moved to 2024 song, as that is against
WP:SONGDAB. Karma is also the WP:COMMONNAME for JoJo’s version and roughly half of the sources for Brit’s refer to her version as “the original version of JoJo’s Karma”. Once more RSs pick up on this and it is clearer which one has the more lasting notability this can be revisited, it is too soon to assume Brit’s will be more notable long term.
This page structure was clearer in my opinion.
CAMERAwMUSTACHE (
talk) 18:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- To further clarify, JoJo’s version is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC because her version kick-started this whole thing and was the first to be officially released. None of the others would be notable without hers as they would just be obscure demos had it not been for the whole JoJo thing prompting their virality.
CAMERAwMUSTACHE (
talk) 19:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is not in play here; that would mean moving the song's article to Karma, and all will agree that that doesn't make sense.
- Whether the JoJo Siwa song is more notable or not is also irrelevant; again, per
WP:SONGDAB, we use the first performer of the song for the title. That's why we have
Torn (Ednaswap song) and
1985 (SR-71 song), even though the Natalie Imbruglia and Bowling for Soup versions are far more notable.
162 etc. (
talk) 21:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- The Siwa version was the first version to be released, does that change anything?
Llacb47 (
talk) 21:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Like I mentioned, it is unusual that the cover was released before the original, which was recorded 12 years earlier and shelved. That being said: JoJo Siwa covered a song that was originally performed by Brit Smith, not the other way around. It's therefore inaccurate, and against established naming convention, to call this a JoJo Siwa song.
162 etc. (
talk) 22:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Selling music is so prevalent in the music industry. I want you to read this article right now and come back: The Middle (Zedd, Maren Morris and Grey song)
- This song was "covered" by 12 people before the final version was released. Does this mean that the title of that wikipedia page should be "The Middle (2018 song)"? It doesn't make sense.
Helpingpeopleyay (
talk) 04:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I see a distinction here because the early demos of "The Middle" are not independently notable - they never got a proper release, never charted, etc. Brit's Smith's song did.
162 etc. (
talk) 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's true, and makes this case somewhat unique (frustratingly). But I linked that article mainly to show that once a song gets officially released, legally it becomes the artist's property. JoJo Siwa basically made Smith's song official with her version. Although Smith's version started as a demo, I think you'd be correct in saying that Smith's version has become independently notable because they released in close proximity, and went viral at the same time. I wonder though why a different wikipedia article can't be made for Smith's version entirely? The songs are the same, but are also different in enough ways, with enough substance and reliable sources to justify standalone wikipedia articles, despite being inherently linked. Would it be incorrect to create a new wikipedia page for Smith's song entirely rather than merging them? Is there a wikipedia policy on this? Otherwise, for now I think the current title of this article is actually all-encompassing and should remain.
Helpingpeopleyay (
talk) 05:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Per
WP:NCOVER, "Notable covers are eligible for standalone articles, provided that the article on the cover can be reasonably-detailed based on facts independent of the original." Whether that's the case here is a different discussion that is beyond the scope of this RM. See also
WP:SPLIT.
162 etc. (
talk) 05:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree that Karma is a cover though. If Smith's version was never released, the song would still stand alone? This is still Siwa's version of the song because she bought the rights? Both are their own versions, there is no cover version - if we were to say that, then this article should be named after the Miley Cyrus version because she recorded a demo first but didn't end up releasing it. Even though Smith officially released her demo, that would still make her's a cover because she wasn't the first to sing it.
Helpingpeopleyay (
talk) 06:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Smith's has been officially released. Miley has not released hers at all. Let alone do we know if Miley even recorded it, that is all alleged. What we do know is Brit Smith recorded hers in 2012 and has since released the recording which is also doing better than Siwa's right now. 96.43.189.203 ( talk) 15:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's unfair to call JoJo's version a 'cover'. Brit Smith's recording was scrapped and would have never seen the light of day if not for JoJo's release. Many songs are shopped around, demoed, and tested with multiple artists; I don't think it'd be fair to call the final versions of those songs 'covers'. Notably, songs that have been 're-recorded' and released by different artists to those who wrote it:
- - Party in the USA, Miley Cyrus ( originally written and performed by Jessie J)
- - Irreplaceable, Beyonce ( originally written and performed by Ne-Yo)
- - Black Widow, Iggy Azalea ( originally written and performed by Katy Perry)
- Among many other examples, the aforementioned demos are all recorded and scrapped from their respective original albums. Is it then fair to say that these songs are all 'covers' of their original demos? If Jessie J were to release her original demo for Party in the USA, would Miley's song become a 'cover', despite it being the first version officially released and marketed?
- I feel as though this scrutiny on JoJo's release is unfairly targeted at her performance of the song. We're yet to see whether Brit Smith's version has longevity or notoriety outside of the buzz generated by JoJo's release -- it makes no sense for this article to be a double-feature, rather than an article focused on the original release of the song (JoJo's) and the controversy/follow up release of a demo of the song.
172.113.242.243 (
talk) 23:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I feel like you were able to put into words what I was thinking, I agree. The practice of selling demos is common, so this case shouldn't be treated so differently.
Helpingpeopleyay (
talk) 00:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with you -- I think much of the controversy online is coming from a misunderstanding of how common of a practise this is in the industry. It's a shame that this song in particular is being trashed so heavily while artists like Ariana Grande, Beyonce, Rihanna, etc, all perform songs not made by them. Some go as far incorporate the demo vocals in the final product (see S&M where Ester Dean's vocals are present throughout the riffs and This Is What You Came For where Taylor Swift's vocals are present throughout the chorus).
- I think retroactively calling something a cover because it was recorded before the first release of a song is unfair. While Brit Smith's recording is more of an 'original', it is not the first performance to be released. I think most people would agree that it'd be silly to call popular songs covers if, theoretically, their demos were to be released officially.
- I think weighting both of these songs equally is unfair to the fact that JoJo was the first to person to have acquired/performed this song to release it. Retroactively marking its significance as the same of an un-released (now-released) demo is a dangerous precedent to set for any future artist who chooses to release/perform a song they wrote but later handed to another artist. 172.113.242.243 ( talk) 03:01, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- I feel like you were able to put into words what I was thinking, I agree. The practice of selling demos is common, so this case shouldn't be treated so differently.
Helpingpeopleyay (
talk) 00:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- I disagree that Karma is a cover though. If Smith's version was never released, the song would still stand alone? This is still Siwa's version of the song because she bought the rights? Both are their own versions, there is no cover version - if we were to say that, then this article should be named after the Miley Cyrus version because she recorded a demo first but didn't end up releasing it. Even though Smith officially released her demo, that would still make her's a cover because she wasn't the first to sing it.
Helpingpeopleyay (
talk) 06:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Per
WP:NCOVER, "Notable covers are eligible for standalone articles, provided that the article on the cover can be reasonably-detailed based on facts independent of the original." Whether that's the case here is a different discussion that is beyond the scope of this RM. See also
WP:SPLIT.
162 etc. (
talk) 05:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- That's true, and makes this case somewhat unique (frustratingly). But I linked that article mainly to show that once a song gets officially released, legally it becomes the artist's property. JoJo Siwa basically made Smith's song official with her version. Although Smith's version started as a demo, I think you'd be correct in saying that Smith's version has become independently notable because they released in close proximity, and went viral at the same time. I wonder though why a different wikipedia article can't be made for Smith's version entirely? The songs are the same, but are also different in enough ways, with enough substance and reliable sources to justify standalone wikipedia articles, despite being inherently linked. Would it be incorrect to create a new wikipedia page for Smith's song entirely rather than merging them? Is there a wikipedia policy on this? Otherwise, for now I think the current title of this article is actually all-encompassing and should remain.
Helpingpeopleyay (
talk) 05:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I see a distinction here because the early demos of "The Middle" are not independently notable - they never got a proper release, never charted, etc. Brit's Smith's song did.
162 etc. (
talk) 05:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Like I mentioned, it is unusual that the cover was released before the original, which was recorded 12 years earlier and shelved. That being said: JoJo Siwa covered a song that was originally performed by Brit Smith, not the other way around. It's therefore inaccurate, and against established naming convention, to call this a JoJo Siwa song.
162 etc. (
talk) 22:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- The Siwa version was the first version to be released, does that change anything?
Llacb47 (
talk) 21:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- To further clarify, JoJo’s version is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC because her version kick-started this whole thing and was the first to be officially released. None of the others would be notable without hers as they would just be obscure demos had it not been for the whole JoJo thing prompting their virality.
CAMERAwMUSTACHE (
talk) 19:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment A
demo is usually understood to mean a "rough draft" of a song. That's not the case with "Karma's a Bitch" - it's a fully-finished product, with production by
Timbaland and music video by
Marc Klasfeld. The song (and video) we see today is exactly the same one that was released - albeit without fanfare - over 10 years ago.
162 etc. (
talk) 14:34, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- While I agree that typically a demo would be considered a rough draft, many songs released by large artists (like Party in the USA by Jessie J) were fully produced and later scrapped, before it was handed to Miley Cyrus with some lyrics mildly re-worked. I think it comes down to a question of whether something can be made a cover retroactively —- hypothetically, if Jessie J were to release her version today, would Miley‘s version become a cover over a decade after release? 172.113.242.243 ( talk) 22:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
Move back to Karma (JoJo Siwa song) This is the correct course. That was the original version that was released publicly. A lot of this maneuvering is just to spite JoJo. PuppyMonkey ( talk) 06:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)- Keep as Karma (2024 song) for now. It is unclear what the title should be at this point as none of the original or suggested titles accurately convey the article's current scope. PuppyMonkey ( talk) 07:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I can't decide on a clear vote, but as the OP says: the article is about the song "as an entity". That "entity" is called "Karma's a Bitch". It just so happens to be that Smith also named her version that, and Siwa used a different name. Titling it "Karma's a Bitch" would be to name the 'entity', not to title it because of it's the name of Smith's version. 86.31.83.194 ( talk) 18:31, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. Songs can be released under different titles (i.e. Many of Horror, recorded by Matt Cardle as " When We Collide"). I would stick with the title of the first official release, "Karma". Heartfox ( talk) 03:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
It's stated at one point in the article that the song was written for Miley Cyrus in 2011. However, the next sentence says that Cyrus allegedly recorded a demo of the song for potential inclusion on her 2010 album Can't Be Tamed. How? 84.69.3.175 ( talk) 21:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Singers can release songs as singles during the album's 'era'. That doesn't mean it still can't be included on the album.
- Either way the claim Miley recorded it in 2011 is all alleged but backed by reliable sources.
96.43.189.203 (
talk) 22:56, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- The article says that it was written (not recorded) in 2011, at least more than five months after the release of Can't Be Tamed (2010), which it's said the song was allegedly recorded for. The problem is that a song can't be released if it hadn't yet been written, so unless there was a scrapped reissue of Can't Be Tamed set to be released in 2011, the earliest album "Karma's a Bitch" could have been considered for is Bangerz (2013). 84.69.3.175 ( talk) 20:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Why’d that get removed? Or maybe I’m confused. SAYITWITHYOURCHEST ( talk) 00:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)