This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Text and/or other creative content from
Justin Bieber on Twitter was copied or moved into
Justin Bieber with
this edit on 27 April 2012. The former page's
history now serves to
provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
Justin Bieber on Twitter was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the
good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that @ladygaga(pictured) and @justinbieber are, respectively, the first and second most-followed celebrities on Twitter?
Current status: Delisted good article
This article was nominated for
deletion review on July 9, 2012. The result of
the discussion was No consensus to overturn.
Moving this article into userspace?
I think people have worked hard on this article a lot. Therefore, someone, like a creator, can take care of this article once and for all. --
George Ho (
talk) 16:06, 12 July 2012 (UTC)reply
No, to maintain GFDL, this needs to stay here so the history can be accessed and it can be a proper redirect. LadyofShalott 16:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Someone might commit vandalism. Userspace is the only way. --
George Ho (
talk) 22:06, 12 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Someone might commit vandalism on any given article or redirect that exists. So? You revert it. If it becomes a frequent problem, we protect the page. Userspace is not the only, or, because of the GFDL requirements, even a valid way. LadyofShalott 02:51, 13 July 2012 (UTC)reply
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Text and/or other creative content from
Justin Bieber on Twitter was copied or moved into
Justin Bieber with
this edit on 27 April 2012. The former page's
history now serves to
provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
Justin Bieber on Twitter was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the
good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that @ladygaga(pictured) and @justinbieber are, respectively, the first and second most-followed celebrities on Twitter?
Current status: Delisted good article
This article was nominated for
deletion review on July 9, 2012. The result of
the discussion was No consensus to overturn.
Moving this article into userspace?
I think people have worked hard on this article a lot. Therefore, someone, like a creator, can take care of this article once and for all. --
George Ho (
talk) 16:06, 12 July 2012 (UTC)reply
No, to maintain GFDL, this needs to stay here so the history can be accessed and it can be a proper redirect. LadyofShalott 16:25, 12 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Someone might commit vandalism. Userspace is the only way. --
George Ho (
talk) 22:06, 12 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Someone might commit vandalism on any given article or redirect that exists. So? You revert it. If it becomes a frequent problem, we protect the page. Userspace is not the only, or, because of the GFDL requirements, even a valid way. LadyofShalott 02:51, 13 July 2012 (UTC)reply